Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mondoreb; flowerplough
But a valid point raised, nevertheless.

Valid because personal labor was lost to the Romans because they were rich enough to be a societal giver to the poor and less affluent because they could afford to give?

Or lost because they lost the true meaning of personal labor and sacrifice in giving via labor because of their affluence.

7 posted on 05/01/2008 5:34:00 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: EGPWS
Or lost because they lost the true meaning of personal labor and sacrifice in giving via labor because of their affluence. I would say this was a large contributing factor. But as a society moves away from its agrarian roots and into affluence, it usually picks up a variety of bad habits--including loss of personal sacrifice for the common good. But the low birth rate (caused perhaps by that loss of values and pursuit of personal pleasure at the expense of family) was a major contributing factor.
8 posted on 05/01/2008 5:44:17 PM PDT by mondoreb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson