1 posted on
04/29/2008 4:32:30 PM PDT by
kellynla
To: kellynla
2 posted on
04/29/2008 4:33:49 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(My kingdom for a beer!)
To: kellynla
Doesn't suprise me.
I have a friend in the FAA that did aircarft in-flight inspections. A few times the TSA would not allow his work computer through the system. He would prove that he is with the FAA and showed them the orders that he was allowed to carry these items. When he was still not allowed to go through, he then would make a call and have the flight delayed. He would get through after that.
3 posted on
04/29/2008 4:39:00 PM PDT by
Paul46360
To: kellynla
Wait one ... I doubt we’re talking about John Jones or Fred Smith here. I know it is not PC, but an Air Marshal named Abdul of Ahmed raises a red flag for me. Imagine the agent names that are likely to coincidentally match those to be found on the list. Yeah, the problem is whacked but this does raise other questions.
4 posted on
04/29/2008 4:40:38 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
To: kellynla
This is just a case of a few coincidences, combined with idiot airline employees not knowing how to handle the no-fly list. The air marshal’s “name” may be on the list, but how many John Smiths are there in the world?
The procedure is then to match birthdate or some other identifying information, and absent that information matching, the person is cleared, usually rather quickly and with a single quick phone call. But all it takes is one or two idiotard counter agents to screw things up. Most counter agents are pretty good, but there are always a few...
5 posted on
04/29/2008 4:41:45 PM PDT by
xjcsa
(Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
To: kellynla
Some federal air marshals have been denied entry to flights they are assigned to protect when their names matched those on the terrorist no-fly list, and the agency says it's now taking steps to make sure their agents are allowed to board in the future.As for you commoners with the same problem, Tough $hit!
6 posted on
04/29/2008 4:42:30 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
((Typical white person))
To: kellynla
Well, of course! Some of those people had been trying to get onto an airliner while armed.
Hey, wait a minute...
To: kellynla
12 posted on
04/29/2008 5:58:22 PM PDT by
RDTF
(my worst nightmare is being on jury duty sequestered with 11 liberals)
To: kellynla
The No-Fly list is a joke and will do NOTHING to stop an attacker with half a brain.
Anyone can get on using any name with a decent fake ID. Bars do more to check for fakes than airports.
13 posted on
04/29/2008 6:35:36 PM PDT by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: kellynla
Well hiring Muhammad Abdul Zareem Skyhook to be a marshall under the diversity program does have its downsides apparently.
14 posted on
04/29/2008 6:48:03 PM PDT by
festus
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: kellynla; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
16 posted on
04/30/2008 8:19:29 AM PDT by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: kellynla
When you indemnify private industry from their failures to give passengers the same rights of common carriage security that is owed to melons , and rely on public bureaucracies , this is the result , just as almost every Freeper was able to predict .
17 posted on
04/30/2008 8:29:20 AM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: kellynla
Fabulous!
It would suit me just fine if everybody winds up on the no-fly list.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson