Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2008 9:38:50 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The_Republican

“The Next McGovern?”

The racist Obama may be even left of McGovern, but the country is considerably less sane (ie more Leftist) than it was in 1972.

After all, a supremely arrogant, openly traitorous,incredibly condescending candidate like Kerry came relatively close to being elected Commander in Chief.


2 posted on 04/23/2008 9:43:09 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

McGovern could probably get elected today


4 posted on 04/23/2008 9:57:35 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

November is looking brighter for McCain with each passing day. All he has to do is avoid a major gaffe while the ‘Rats keep bashing each other around and expose how radically left they are for all to see.

Could it be that HRC is staying in the race merely to cripple Obama so that he can’t win the presidency, thus opening up things for a repaeat run for her in 2012?


5 posted on 04/23/2008 9:59:41 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Its ideology is very liberal. Whereas in the first primaries and caucuses, Obama benefited from being seen as middle-of-the-road or even conservative, he is now receiving his strongest support from voters who see themselves as "very liberal." In Pennsylvania, he defeated Clinton among "very liberal" voters by 55 to 45 percent, but lost "somewhat conservative" voters by 53 to 47 percent and moderates by 60 to 40 percent. In Wisconsin and Virginia, by contrast, he had done best against Clinton among voters who saw themselves as moderate or somewhat conservative.

Osbama is so wackjob liberal that he actually makes Hillary seem thoughful and responisible (at times).

11 posted on 04/23/2008 10:09:55 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; dennisw; juliej; Miss Didi; Liz; Nancee; Marysecretary; theothercheek; ...

Ping!


13 posted on 04/23/2008 10:15:14 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Fact is Obama's a weak, vulnerable, inexperienced candidate.

But if the Dims don't nominate him now, they can kiss the black vote goodbye this election. It won't go to McCain, but it won't go to Obama either. As bad as the Republican numbers look right now, the Dims can't win without a big black turnout.

The Superdelegates know all this. It sucks to be them. :-))

15 posted on 04/23/2008 10:29:18 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

Whoever wins the Democrat nomination will have the whole democrat machine and the leftist media on his side. And if hillary wins, she still knows how to get out the black vote.

McCain, meanwhile, is a positively lousy candidate. He turns off the base, and when push comes to shove the MSM will demonize him as a warmongering conservative racist and he won’t get any Democrat votes either, as he is stupidly hoping.

Nor will he get any money or people to turn out the vote, other than the paid professionals.


19 posted on 04/23/2008 10:48:43 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Whereas in the first primaries and caucuses, Obama benefited from being seen as middle-of-the-road or even conservative,

On which planet do these particular people live?

23 posted on 04/23/2008 10:56:35 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican


Lets hope so....
29 posted on 04/23/2008 11:46:03 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Clinton's best chance of winning the nomination was to win Pennsylvania so decisively that she would have set off a media firestorm...

It is interesting to note that this sentence fragment admits that the media sees itself as the arbiter of democrat power. If a "media firestorm" is necessary, why doesn't the media simply create one out of thin air, as they do for Republicans?

31 posted on 04/24/2008 5:26:06 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson