Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2008 8:01:50 AM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: seanmerc

What about Americans? I really don’t care if Iran wants to nuke their Islamic neighbors. Sans Israel.


2 posted on 04/23/2008 8:03:52 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
TOE-SUCKER SPEAKS!
3 posted on 04/23/2008 8:04:21 AM PDT by Old Sarge (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

It’s really important to create as much distance as possibls between Herself and the “Football.”


4 posted on 04/23/2008 8:05:31 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

There goes what’s left of her Moonbat support.


5 posted on 04/23/2008 8:06:28 AM PDT by DogBarkTree (The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Clinton astonishingly responded that she’d use American nukes not just to defend Israel, our traditional strategic ally, but also other neighboring states such as the U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait from an Iranian nuclear attack.
:::::::
This, from a woman who is a well-establish professional liar? Now what do you REALLY believe?


6 posted on 04/23/2008 8:07:13 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

I was watching Dick on H & C a few nights ago, and I have to agree with Colmes; all the dude does is slam The Beast. He never stops, never takes a breath, just keeps bitching. After awhile, it does get somewhat old, something the Colmes was alluding to.


7 posted on 04/23/2008 8:15:37 AM PDT by toddlintown (Censorship is alive and well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
....she can't even "protect" female WH interns from Bubba, how does she propose to protect our friends.
14 posted on 04/23/2008 8:37:22 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (just b/c you're paranoid,doesn't mean "they" aren't out to get you..our hopes were dashed by CINOs :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Wouldn’t a preventative strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities be easier? Cleaner? Less deadly?


15 posted on 04/23/2008 8:39:42 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Here we go again.....protecting the Arabs. Let them solve their own problems.


17 posted on 04/23/2008 8:41:31 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

I can understand Dick’s criticism of Hillary; but not his hatred of her. I seems to really be eating at his soul. It is palpable whenever he’s on the tube...he never seems to have the same burning vitriolic feelings for Bill and he really has been non-critical of Obama all-the-while dinging Hillary and throwing a barb or two at McCain too.


18 posted on 04/23/2008 8:43:04 AM PDT by meandog (Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 273 and counting! Stay home and get Baraked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
Barack Obama's far more sensible answer was simply to commit to definitively and aggressively extend our deterrent protection to Israel . . . period.

No bias from these writers! Fair and balanced as always...

20 posted on 04/23/2008 8:46:26 AM PDT by Edgerunner (At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT

..................

I certainly wouldn't trust Hillary, and I wouldn't support a formal commitment, but this is precisely what we should be telling Iran, and our oil producing allies in the region. An attack the heart of America's economic strength is an attack, and will be responded to.

21 posted on 04/23/2008 8:52:17 AM PDT by SJackson (before we work on problems, have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation, Michelle O.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Not long ago the Dems were suggesting that we consider taking action against Saudi Arabia because 19 of 21 hijackers were Saudi nationals. Now they’re suggesting we use our nuclear deterrent to protect them? Which is it?

Reminds me of that dialog in “Animal House”: Hey, they can’t do that to our Pledges! Yeah, only we can do that to our Pledges! Government by National Lampoon.


22 posted on 04/23/2008 9:11:11 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Am I missing something? Why are we promising to protect anyone in the Middle East? IT’s a cauldron always ready to blow. Our nukes are for when we get attacked.

As I understand it, Israel has enough nukes to annihilate Iran many times over...Let them deal with things in their neighborhood.


23 posted on 04/23/2008 9:12:34 AM PDT by onguard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
But now Sen. Clinton appears willing to mortgage America's cities to protect nations like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the U.A.E., which includes Dubai, which has paid her husband (and the Clintons' joint bank accounts) almost $15 million in the past seven years. Indeed, is it a coincidence that all three of the countries that she mentioned were generous benefactors to her husband's library? (While donations to the library remain secret, it's known that the Saudi monarchy gave $10 million.)

There are no coincidences when it comes to the Clintons and money.
25 posted on 04/23/2008 1:47:34 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
No American president has ever made so sweeping a commitment in the region — but Hillary appears eager to break new ground.

Anything via political rhetoric to achieve personal gain and live in the White House again.

The Clinton dogma with life...

27 posted on 04/23/2008 6:11:22 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
Clintons: Liars Lie

28 posted on 04/23/2008 6:12:43 PM PDT by bannie (clintons CHEAT! It's their only weapon.; & Barry/Barack has two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
Politicians will SAY ANYTHING....

If Iran nukes ANY middle east country..including Israel...The United States of America will do what it did in Vietnam and what it will do in Iraq...it will run away and let the people it promised to defend on its own...in other words the States will do ZERO (0) !

I wonder if America would even retaliate with nukes if one of its city's were hit by nuclear weapon???

32 posted on 04/23/2008 8:55:55 PM PDT by forYourChildrenVote4Bush (911 Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson