Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm starting to like these brothers.
1 posted on 04/21/2008 6:47:39 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ryan71

At least it wasn’t a White House staffer flying Marine Corp One to a golf course to play a round....


2 posted on 04/21/2008 6:51:21 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

I’m sure they’ll catch hell for it but the govt sometimes gives it’s young pilots expensive machines to play with on the weekend. It’s called cross country training. I’m guessing the rules will change now.


3 posted on 04/21/2008 6:51:50 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
Given the history of British princes, this is pretty mild behavior.

Between these kind of "Jack the lad" antics which the male punters will love, William's appeal to the ladies, and Harry's military service, the princes are insuring the continued existence of the monarchy for another generation.

4 posted on 04/21/2008 6:52:15 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

Gigi La Chance. Now there’s a name to beware of...


5 posted on 04/21/2008 6:52:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

Well, it was on the way......


6 posted on 04/21/2008 6:52:34 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

And the British taxpayers picked up the tab for his little weekend romp. I wonder if he observed the 12 hour “bottle to throttle” rule that weekend. I doubt it.


8 posted on 04/21/2008 6:56:10 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
but MPs demanded to know why the young royals were allowed to use the Chinook aircraft as a "stag do taxi service".

Sheesh, give them some slack. As Franklin might have said: "a monarchy, if you can keep it".

9 posted on 04/21/2008 6:56:20 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
Prince William's '£30K stunt' as he lands RAF helicopter in Kate's back garden

OK, that explains the apostrophe.

10 posted on 04/21/2008 6:57:54 AM PDT by Allegra (Tehran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

For once let guys be guys


11 posted on 04/21/2008 7:00:05 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (Proud to be an Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
. . . . "MPs demanded to know why the young royals were allowed to use the Chinook aircraft as a "stag do taxi service"

I tend to agree with the MPs. Why should the British (over)taxedpayers have to foot the bill for William's stag party joyride? If he wants to fly a helo to party, he can rent one at his own expense - NOT the taxpayers. That's NOT what those military choppers are for!!

15 posted on 04/21/2008 7:03:13 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
His main squeeze's family is apparently no slouch in the bank account department, if this thing will fit comfortably in her "back yard".

My guess is she prolly doesn't have to mow the grass on Saturdays ...


18 posted on 04/21/2008 7:07:43 AM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
I'm starting to like these brothers. No guts, no glory. Pretty funny stunt
20 posted on 04/21/2008 7:11:03 AM PDT by colinhester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Middleton family home is 16 miles away from RAF Odiham and the prince landed the Chinook in the field at the back of the house

23 posted on 04/21/2008 7:15:10 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

I’m not sure if it’s still done, but during the Viet Nam era it was not unusual to take an aircraft for a weekend and visit home or go pick up shrimp in LA or king crab from WA. It was called ‘instrument training”.


25 posted on 04/21/2008 7:20:13 AM PDT by newbolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqkdcT25ss


26 posted on 04/21/2008 7:21:32 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaelysium
My father was an Navy pilot back from flying off the Hornet in the Korean War, and then teaching in Florida. Around 1955, they would detour from Pensicola to Guantanamo Bay and fill their wings up with booze to bring back. I still have two bottles from Guantanamo Bay. US Navy stamp #32093233 on the bottle of 'tree vines brandy' while the remy martin cognac's stamp is gone.

I don't think that pilots can do that kind stuff anymore, their flight plans are absolute.

27 posted on 04/21/2008 7:25:14 AM PDT by antonia ("Information is terrain and someone will occupy it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71
This thread's an excuse to post this chinook pic (again):

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

28 posted on 04/21/2008 7:25:21 AM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

In flight speak, I guess one could describe this trip as a few “touch and go’s”. That actually is legitimate training- as is landing the chopper at an unprepared landing site (although that field probably wasn’t too difficult). I’m sure the “touch and go’s” continued well after they got off the chopper...


34 posted on 04/21/2008 7:53:08 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

Way to go, Willie!


39 posted on 04/21/2008 8:17:52 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ryan71

Nothing wrong with keeping current with your cross country flying. Why do you think there are travel pods for fighter aircraft?


44 posted on 04/21/2008 9:06:10 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson