Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Smart” Gun Bill to be Considered on Tuesday, April 15 in the California Assembly!
NRA - ILA ^ | April 10, 2008 | NA

Posted on 04/12/2008 2:23:16 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: neverdem
...handguns with a permanent, programmable biometric feature that renders the firearm useless unless activated by the authorized user. No proven, viable handgun of this type has ever been developed.
Translation: No one can buy a hand gun ever again.

That should be the name of the bill.

Yea, let's have a bill that says the only firearm you can buy doesn't exist.

21 posted on 04/12/2008 10:34:33 AM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Huummmm,,

I already own a ‘smart gun’.

Works every time I go to shoot it.

Nice, easy to operate and maintain. Ergometric controls. Avalible in different calibers.

What, you say, what kind is it?

The smartest one out there

M1911, 45 ACP - made in 1916. John Moses got it right the first time... And that my FRiends, is one smart gun (weapon actually, but you know what I mean)


22 posted on 04/12/2008 10:55:01 AM PDT by ASOC (Training Storungen werden auf Papier notiert. Taktische Storungen werden im Stein geatzt. Gen Rommel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the post and your efforts as always.


23 posted on 04/12/2008 10:58:54 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If these technologies actually worked, they would be of greater value to cops than to the average citizen. Cops, after all, are often required to put themselves in situations where they're at risk of having their guns stolen--situations which ordinary citizens would generally avoid.

Therefore, any exemption for cops must be taken as an acknowledgment that the technologies don't actually work; to mandate such technologies when they don't work is to acknowledge that failure is not considered a 'bad thing'.

24 posted on 04/12/2008 10:59:19 AM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Why only a political base?


25 posted on 04/12/2008 11:07:23 AM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

“Political base” - simply a phrase meaning electing like-minded people who will protect your back and you theirs.

For example, the elected sheriff in my county, along with his deputies, is a strong constitutionalist who believes in the 2nd amendment. We like that.


26 posted on 04/12/2008 2:02:50 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Governments hate armed citizens more than armed criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Seems more friendly than other alternatives we can think of.


27 posted on 04/12/2008 4:08:37 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson