Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forget warming - beware the new ice age - Part XXVII
National Post ^ | June 15, 2007 | Lawrence Solomon

Posted on 03/30/2008 2:08:55 PM PDT by Delacon

In the 1970s, leading scientists claimed that the world was threatened by an era of global cooling.

Based on what we've learned this decade, says George Kukla, those scientists - and he was among them -- had it right. The world is about to enter another Ice Age.

Dr. Kukla, in 1972 a member of the Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences and a pioneer in the field of astronomical forcing, became a central figure in convincing the United States government to take the dangers of climate change seriously. In January of that year, he and another geologist, Robert Matthews of Brown University, convened what would become a historic conference of top European and American investigators in Providence, R.I. The working conference's theme: "The Present Interglacial: How and When will it End?"

Later that year, Drs. Kukla and Matthews highlighted the dangers of global cooling in Science magazine and, because of the urgency of the matter, in December they also alerted President Richard Nixon in a joint letter. The conference had reached a consensus, their letter stated, that "a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experienced by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon. The cooling has natural cause and falls within the rank of processes which produced the last ice age."

The White House reacted swiftly to the letter, which described "substantially lowered food production" and "extreme weather anomalies," such as killer frosts and floods, as well as a warning that the Soviet Union might already be in the lead in preparing for the climate disturbances to come. By February 1973, the State Department had established a Panel on the Present Interglacial, which advised Drs. Kukla and Matthews that it "was seized of the matter."

Soon, numerous other government agencies were drawn in -- the issue was seen to be of paramount importance -- and by 1974, a federal government report, A United States Climate Program, cited evidence of the gathering storm, including:

"A killing winter freeze, followed by a severe summer heat wave in the United States.

"Drought in the Soviet Union producing a 12% shortfall in their grain production in 1972, forcing the country to purchase grain abroad, which in turn reduced world grain reserves and helped drive up food prices.

"Collapse of the Peruvian anchovy harvest in late 1972 and early 1973, related to fluctuations in the Pacific Ocean currents and atmospheric circulation, impacted world supplies of fertilizer, the soybean market and prices of other protein feed stocks.

"The anomalously low precipitation in the U.S. Pacific Northwest during the winter of 1972-73 depleted water-reservoir storage by an amount equivalent to an amount of water required to generate more than 7% of the electric energy for the region."

By 1975, the first of numerous bills, such as the "National Climate Program Act of 1975," was introduced to establish a co-ordinated national program of climate research, monitoring, prediction and contingency-planning analysis. Much congressional testimony spoke of the inadequacy of climate research and the need for preparedness. Meanwhile, the failure of the Soviet Union's wheat crop (and a subsequent high-profile U.S. wheat deal), the severe winter of 1976-77 and El Nino's influence on climate became dinner-table talk, heightening the government's desire to predict the climate. In September, 1979, President Jimmy Carter signed the National Climate Program Act into law, in aid of predicting future climate and combating global cooling. That act has now been enlisted in the effort to counter global warming.

Many today speak with derision of the 1970s global-cooling scare, seeing it as a cautionary false alarm. Others see it as an embarrassment -- Newsweek magazine, which published a 1975 article entitled "The Cooling World," even corrected the record with a 2006 follow-up to its 1975 article arguing that scientists now have it right.

Dr. Kukla sees it -- and the 1975 Newsweek article -- differently. Although the magazine article indicated that the cooling trend would be continuous, scientists knew otherwise. "None of us expected uninterrupted continuation of the trend," he states. Moreover, thanks to new evidence that Dr. Kukla only recently published, he now knows that global warming always precedes an ice age. That makes the current period of global warming a mere blip that constitutes additional indication of the ice age to come.

To Dr. Kukla, the fundamental issue here could not be more clear. For millions of years, the geologic record shows, Earth has experienced an ongoing cycle of ice ages, each typically lasting about 100,000 years, and each punctuated by briefer, warmer periods called interglacials, such as the one we are now in. This ongoing cycle closely matches cyclic variations in Earth's orbit around the sun.

"I feel we're on pretty solid ground in interpreting orbit around the sun as the primary driving force behind ice-age glaciation. The relationship is just too clear and consistent to allow reasonable doubt," Dr. Kukla said. "It's either that, or climate drives orbit, and that just doesn't make sense."

--- - Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Urban Renaissance Institute and Consumer Policy Institute, divisions of Energy Probe Research Foundation. www.urban-renaissance.org.

CV OF A DENIER:

George Kukla, micropalentologist and Special Research Scientist at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, is a pioneer in the study of solar forcing of climate changes. He was the lead author of the scientific paper that first supported Milutin Milankovic's theory of glacial cycles by investigating the stratigraphy in deep-sea sediment cores from the southern Indian Ocean. In the cores were clear imprints of Milankovic's proposed cycles. In his paper he wrote, "We are certain now that changes in the Earth's orbital geometry caused the ice ages. The evidence is so strong that other explanations must now be discarded or modified." Prior to joining Columbia in 1971, he had published landmark studies in Czechoslovakia, where he was a member of the Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences.

LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alarmists; climatechange; globalwarming; skeptics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
As you may know, for the past week, I have been posting The Deniers series by Lawrence Solomon of the National Post. Well, I happened to drop by "Planet Gore" over at National Review Online today. Its their blog on all things related to climate change. I highly recommend periodic visits to this blog for anyone concerned about climate change. Anyway, low and behold, I discovered that yesterday the 27th, Sterling Burnett mentions the The Deniers series (is it that Burnett follows the happenings here on Free Republic?) and says the Lawrence Solomon has written a book based on The Deniers series. I am grateful to Mr. Solomon for the series and am happily plugging his book by posting Mr. Burnett's blog post (contains a link to the book on Amazon) in the rest of my posts on the series:
 

Must-Read Global-Warming Book   [Sterling Burnett]

About a year ago, Canadian environmentalist and journalist Lawrence Solomon began a series of articles in the National Post examining the credentials of and arguments made by scientists and economists labeled “deniers” by various environmentalists, a number of mainstream environmental reporters, and some politicians. Solomon, true to the finest tenets of his profession, sought the truth concerning whether there was in fact a consensus on the headline-grabbing issue of global warming, or whether in fact any “real” scientists actually dissented from the Al Gore/UN line that global warming is happening, is largely caused by humans, and threatens all manner of catastrophies.

As many people — policy wonks and fellow travelers — on this blog are well aware, dissenting scientists are not in fact rare: There are serious scholars whose views should, but too often do not, inform the debate. Solomon’s columns were important because they brought this message to a wider audience. As Solomon’s knowledge grew, he found that the genre limits of newspaper writing precluded an adequately in-depth exploration of these skeptical scientists’ important observations. Accordingly, selecting some of the scientists discussed in his columns, Solomon has written a book: The Deniers: The World-Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**and those who are too fearful to do so. As a jacket blurb puts it, “What he found shocked him. Solomon discovered that on every “headline” global warming issue, not only were there serious scientists who dissented, consistently the dissenters were by far the more accomplished and eminent scientists.”

This book does not attempt to settle the science, or show that humans are or are not responsible for the present warming trend, or settle what we can expect the future harms/benefits of continued warming (or cooling) might be. Rather, the genius of the book is that it shows in a manner accessible to a lay audience that uncertainties concerning each important facet of the “consensus” view on warming abound, and that the dissenting views are at least as plausible (and often more compelling) than the IPCC/Gore camps.



The Deniers, examines what should be the active debates concerning the plausibility of the argument that human CO2 emissions (or CO2 per se) is a driver for climate change, what role the sun may play in warming, what role the present warming trend (and human activities) play in hurricane and tropical/parasitic disease patterns, and the reliability of the climate models, among other issues. In addition, Solomon notes the harsh treatment that many scientists have endured simply because they followed the scientific method, the evidence from their research, and their own consciences, all of which led them to the conclusion that this or that facet of the global-warming consensus view was woefully incomplete or flat-out wrong. This treatment has had the effect intended by global warming scaremongers — to shut down promising areas of research and to silence credible critics. As I put it in an earlier column:

The term skeptic has historically been a badge of honor proudly worn by scientists as indicating their commitment to the idea that in the pursuit of truth, nothing is beyond question, every bit of knowledge is open to improvement and/or refutation as new evidence or better theories emerge. However, in the topsy-turvy field of climate science, “skeptic” is a term of opprobrium and to be labeled a skeptic is to be dismissed as a hack. Being a skeptic concerning global warming today is akin to being a heretic in the Middle Ages — you may not be literally burned at the stake, but your reputation will be put to flames.

In response, many scientists whose research calls into question one or more of the fundamental tenets of global warming orthodoxy, have learned to couch their conclusions carefully. They argue, for instance, that while their research does not match up with this or that point in global warming theory, or would seem to undermine this or that conclusion, they are not denying that humans are causing global warming and they cannot account for the discrepancy between their work and the theory’s predictions. These scientists have learned the hard lesson that when reality and the theory conflict, for professional reasons, they’d better cling to the theory: shades of Galileo recanting his theory that the earth revolves around the sun under pressure from the Inquisition.

Though there are many good books on global warming, The Deniers is among the most effective in showing how science is being fundamentally undermined in the current politicized atmosphere of climate research. In addition, like no other book or paper I know, it provides a concise but thorough overview of the myriad weaknesses of the consensus view, the quality and substance of the criticisms of that view, and the stellar qualifications of those scientists labeled derisively as “deniers.”

This book should be read by anyone who seriously wants to understand where and why substantive debate remains concerning climate change and why there is so much vitriol surrounding what until recently was a relatively quiet, unheralded, or unnoticed (except by its practitioners) field of science. If a person could read only one book this year on climate change, this is the one I’d pick.

http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjJmZDYxZThlMzNmNzYzZmIzMGExNWY0Mzg1MGRiZTY=

Climate change: The Deniers

National Post  Published: Friday, February 09, 2007

Earth

The Post's series on scientists who buck the conventional wisdom on climate science. Here is the series so far:

Statistics needed -- The Deniers Part I
Warming is real -- and has benefits -- The Deniers Part II
The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science -- The Deniers Part III
Polar scientists on thin ice -- The Deniers Part IV
The original denier: into the cold -- The Deniers Part V
The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI
Will the sun cool us? -- The Deniers Part VII
The limits of predictability -- The Deniers Part VIII
Look to Mars for the truth on global warming -- The Deniers Part IX
Limited role for C02 -- the Deniers Part X
End the chill -- The Deniers Part XI
Clouded research -- The Deniers Part XII
Allegre's second thoughts -- The Deniers XIII
The heat's in the sun -- The Deniers XIV
Unsettled Science -- The Deniers XV
Bitten by the IPCC -- The Deniers XVI
Little ice age is still within us -- The Deniers XVII
Fighting climate 'fluff' -- The Deniers XVIII

Science, not politics -- The Deniers XIX
Gore's guru disagreed -- The Deniers XX
The ice-core man -- The Deniers XXI
Some restraint in Rome -- The Deniers XXII
Discounting logic -- The Deniers XXIII
Dire forecasts aren't new -- The Deniers XXIV
They call this a consensus? - Part XXV
NASA chief Michael Griffin silenced - Part XXVI
Forget warming - beware the new ice age - Part XXVII

 
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=c6a32614-f906-4597-993d-f181196a6d71

1 posted on 03/30/2008 2:08:56 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; ...

Ping and this is the final article in the series.


2 posted on 03/30/2008 2:10:36 PM PDT by Delacon (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Proving one again, if you want to know the correct side of any issue or subject, just look at what the left wingers are doing and do the exact opposite.

Global cooling, now that's an environmental catastrophe I can support.

Who wants to go skiing?

3 posted on 03/30/2008 2:12:33 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I’ve lived in the Arctic. I fear an ice age far more than I do global warming.


4 posted on 03/30/2008 2:12:47 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

We better get our Global Warming solutions in place quickly, because it looks like another disaster is right on the horizon.


5 posted on 03/30/2008 2:17:00 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Based on what we've learned this decade, says George Kukla,

I liked Fran and Ollie much better.

..but on a Sunday afternoon in January, in Iowa and in the 1950's that was big entertainment for a 10-year old.

6 posted on 03/30/2008 2:18:56 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Me too. A vast amount of the worlds food productions occurs in areas that would be devestated by another ice age.


7 posted on 03/30/2008 2:20:32 PM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I spent time in Moscow at 43 below zero, I’ll take the heat anytime.


8 posted on 03/30/2008 2:21:13 PM PDT by Shirerwasright (Liberalism continues to erode the foundations of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
This is why the environmentalist whackos on the left have stopped using the term "Global Warming" and are using the term "Global Climate Change" instead. Global Climate Change is much more flexible than Global Warming or Global Cooling.

Is it warmer today than average? It is because of Global Climate Change.

Is it cooler today than average? It is because of Global Climate Change.

Wetter? Dryer? Cloudier? Less cloudy? Windier? Less windy? It doesn't matter.

Whenever there is bad weather anywhere in the world it is because of Global Climate Change - caused by Bush and those damned SUVs.

The only solution is to turn over more and more control of the world's economy to the left.

9 posted on 03/30/2008 2:24:44 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Sounds like Al Gore will just have to get by somehow on the 100 million he scammed out of the global warming hoax.


10 posted on 03/30/2008 2:25:33 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

ping-thanks


11 posted on 03/30/2008 2:31:41 PM PDT by MattinNJ ("Conservatives" will stay home in November and hand the socialists the election. Unbelievable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I’m offering 10 to one odds that carbon credits are the solution to global cooling. Any takers?


12 posted on 03/30/2008 2:37:48 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

I just don’t get it. Why are all the carbon emissions that cause global warming, making it warmer during the winters? Why would they only cause warmer weather during the summer?


13 posted on 03/30/2008 2:40:40 PM PDT by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



14 posted on 03/30/2008 2:41:22 PM PDT by xcamel (Forget the past and you're doomed to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD

Correction.

Why are all the carbon emission NOT making it warmer during the winter?


15 posted on 03/30/2008 2:42:16 PM PDT by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

They recently tied increased earthquake activity to “global climate change” as well. Same goes for diseases.

It is not hyperbole or an attempt at humor - what was once viewed as the wrath of God in response to human moral sin is now viewed as the wrath of Gaea in response to human material/wealth abundance (inequality, waste, whatever). The witch doctor has now replaced the priest. Most individuals do not seem capable of harboring a personal teleological chasm - something apparently will fill the void left in our minds for an element of ‘cosmic justice’.


16 posted on 03/30/2008 2:42:27 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

In a cyclical energy system don’t the laws of thermodynamics dictate that the long term trend will always be the lower energy state?


17 posted on 03/30/2008 2:44:02 PM PDT by naturalized ("The time has come," He said. "The kingdom of God is near. Repent and believe the good news!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD
Why are all the carbon emissions that cause global warming, making it warmer during the winters?

Carbon as CO2 is a negligible contributor to "global warming", it is a greenhouse gas, yes, but a much more powerful and prevalent "greenhouse gas" is water vapor.

The whole killer carbon scam is based on hype and nothing more.

There's a great deal of controversy concerning the planet warming, many of the sensors for detecting daily temperatures are located in heat islands surrounded by blacktop. Causing a false high as compared the actual temperatures just a few hundred yards away from the sensors.

There's lots of info if you want to look for it concerning temperature sensor locations and the contribution to the global warming scam.
18 posted on 03/30/2008 2:53:27 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: naturalized

That’s true of the whole, but not necessarily true of parts.


19 posted on 03/30/2008 3:02:36 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

I thought you’d be offering more 2-3 odds...you’d be paying out a ton at 10-1 since there is a 100% chance they will be the solution...or at least that’s what we’ll be told...


20 posted on 03/30/2008 3:03:29 PM PDT by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson