Posted on 03/29/2008 2:09:04 PM PDT by wagglebee
WASHINGTON (BP)--Oregon recorded more deaths by physician-assisted suicide in 2007 than in any year in the decade since the practice was legalized.
The Oregon Department of Human Services recently reported 49 people committed suicide last year using lethal doses of drugs prescribed by doctors. The previous yearly high was 46 in 2006.
Oregon, the only state to legalize assisted suicide, has recorded 341 such deaths since its Death With Dignity Act took effect in late 1997.
"The report shows that the situation in Oregon is not only creepy but creeping," bioethicist C. Ben Mitchell told Baptist Press. "Compassion means providing alternatives to assisted suicide, not contributing to the death toll.
"I'm sure that physicians who assist in the death of their patients think they're providing a needed service, but so did the Nazi doctors under Hitler. Instead, they are turning medicine into murder," said Mitchell, director of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity in suburban Chicago and consultant to the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.
None of those who committed suicide last year in Oregon with the assistance of a doctor were referred to a psychologist or psychiatrist before receiving a lethal prescription, a fact criticized by opponents of the practice.
Forty-three of the 49 who utilized assisted suicide were enrolled in hospice care.
An element "of hospice care is supposed to include suicide prevention when a patient expresses a desire to commit suicide," said bioethics specialist Wesley Smith on the bioethics.com weblog. "Wanna bet that didn't happen in these cases? How do we know? [T]here were zero referrals of suicidal patients to mental health professionals."
Mitchell said, "To whatever extent the hospice community is cooperating with assisted suicide, they are perverting the hospice tradition. Hospice and palliative care are about dying well, not killing patients."
Upon the March 18 release of the report, the Physicians for Compassionate Care Education Foundation reiterated its opposition to assisted suicide, saying it:
-- "Undermines trust in the patient-physician relationship;
-- "Changes the societal role of physicians from healer to executioner;
-- "Endangers the value that society places on life, specifically for those who are most vulnerable."
Pastors and congregations need to engage the issue, Mitchell said. "Churches should ban together with Physicians for Compassionate Care to stop the madness in Oregon," he said.
Oregon's latest report also showed:
-- About one-third of those who took their lives said they experienced inadequate pain control or expressed concern about it.
-- The number of physicians who prescribed the drugs and were present when patients took them was 11, only 22 percent of the number of assisted suicides. In 2006, it was 33 percent.
-- The median duration of the patient-physician relationship was just eight weeks.
-- Cancer was by far the No. 1 disease, with 86 percent of those who committed suicide having a malignant tumor.
-- Twenty-six of the 49 people who died by assisted suicide were males; all but one were white; only 21 were married, and all had medical insurance.
-- Prescriptions written for lethal doses totaled 85, though many were not used last year.
Now the hospices are probably recommending suicide.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Are they all Liberals??
Better do the sarc/off thing so I won't get flamed!
Ping
Oregon is finally #1 in something. If I lived in that liberal sink-hole, I’d be tempted to off myself, too.
I would prefer that my doctors did not include being expert executioners in their job descriptions...
Insanity.
I’m surprised that Jack Kevorkian doesn’t move there.
He would rather ply his wares as a congressman.
My dad was in at home hospie care, and they might as well have killed him with the treatment he was receiving. If it weren’t for myself and my brother he would have died a lot sooner then he did. Goes to show what government medicine really is.
I find it odd how we accept war but not adults choosing their time of departure from incapacitating and debilitating terminal illness.
I won’t even touch the topic of abortion.
But for people at the end stage of their lives - they are to be judged by you?
Stop war and abortion and I’ll climb on the no suicide bandwagon.
Of course not. Because when it becomes a universal "right," all the libertarians will protest about their tax dollars being used inefficiently.
Such inhuman "options" tempt people to "off" themselves.
It's a whole lot like abortion. It's called pro-choice, and its marketed to people who feel they have "no" choice.
Why can't we help people who are terminally ill, especially if they have no family who are willing or able to care for them, be welcomed into a simple decent place where they can live -- clean, fed, clothed, sheltered --- where helpers, kin or dear ones can sit by, pray, open beers and trade wisecracks, and administer comfort care, until well-and-truly natural death comes and claims the dying person?
This was the original idea of hospice, and this would be the better option.
I recently came across a wonderful group of people who are committed to helping people "live through dying" in a comfortable, cared-for and dignified way. They are called Martha & Mary Ministries. If you go to their LINKS PAGE and click on the first one, called "Building Hope," you can get to a pdf which explains their vision.
I think they're wonderful. When my times comes, I'd like to spend my waning days in such a loving, caring place.
IB4z.
(I'll shred your statement later if there's time, unless someone else gets to it first. It's very low-hanging fruit).
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.