1 posted on
03/27/2008 6:57:05 AM PDT by
seanmerc
To: seanmerc
The Beast will not be happy.
2 posted on
03/27/2008 6:57:22 AM PDT by
seanmerc
To: seanmerc
3 posted on
03/27/2008 6:58:53 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: seanmerc
cue captain obvious.
OF COURSE ELTON JOHN IS CRIMINALLY VIOLATING THE LAW.
His performance is SPECIFIC to intervent in a US election.
5 posted on
03/27/2008 7:03:09 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: seanmerc
Wait, didn’t this goof ball do a fund raiser for Kerry in 2004 ?
6 posted on
03/27/2008 7:05:14 AM PDT by
ncalburt
To: seanmerc; doug from upland
Isn’t the performance itself an “in kind” contribution that has to be assessed a dollar value? Or are they paying Sir Elton (it had better be his usual fee) as though he were simply performing at any private/corporate venue? This seems suspiciously like the kind of thing they did with the 2000 Hollyweird Gala for Shrillary’s Senate campaign - wonder if they’ll have their books kept honestly this time.
p.s. Maybe we should give them a pass if Sir Elton plays “The Bitch is Back” with Shrillary onstage!!
7 posted on
03/27/2008 7:06:01 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Careful, Obama - Hillary May Soon Decide to Exercise the "Tonya Harding Option")
To: seanmerc; doug from upland
Doug—why does this sound familiar?/s/
8 posted on
03/27/2008 7:06:11 AM PDT by
exit82
(People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
To: seanmerc
A Clinton, receiving unlawful foreign campaign contributions? Stop the presses!!!11 This has never happenedz b4!!!1
At least they're not getting a free ride in the press anymore.
9 posted on
03/27/2008 7:06:16 AM PDT by
faloi
To: seanmerc
All he has to do is charge a customary fee for the performance, and it becomes a non-issue. Then he only has to remain quiet when the check bounces.
10 posted on
03/27/2008 7:06:22 AM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
To: seanmerc
The Clintons operate under the principles of “It’s better to ask forgiveness than permission” and if you “load up the FEC with thousands of complaints it won’t get sorted out until you are out of office”.
It’s kinda like how Bill had to absolutely get elected the first time else the law was going to catch up to him and Hillary for all their misdeeds. Being President meant he could control (er manage?) the procesutions against him.
11 posted on
03/27/2008 7:06:26 AM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: seanmerc
Maybe she should have used Yoko Ono...
12 posted on
03/27/2008 7:07:41 AM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: seanmerc
I guess I get to say, “I told ya so!”
I posted this very question in the first appearance of this story some time ago on FR. Seemed soooo very obvious!
To: seanmerc
England has two old Queens.
14 posted on
03/27/2008 7:11:33 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: seanmerc
Gee, can I pick the set?
Open with:
Funeral for a Friend
All the Young Girls Love Alice
The Bitch is Back
Little ‘frigerator
Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting
Better Off Dead
Texan Love Song
Fascist Faces
Heart’s in the Right Place
Madness
Don’t Let the Sun Go Down on Me
Have Mercy on the Criminal
Ticking
15 posted on
03/27/2008 7:12:24 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
To: seanmerc
I'm shocked , absolutely shocked that the Clintons would lean against the law. Especially after all that Chinese money that have taken.
17 posted on
03/27/2008 7:18:10 AM PDT by
tsali
To: Interesting Times
22 posted on
03/27/2008 7:48:35 AM PDT by
BubbaBasher
(Without the 2nd ammendment there would be no 1st ammendment!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson