If the candidate with the most pledged delegates should win every time, what do the Dems have Superdelegates for? I thought that system was instituted as a firewall against a radical, unelectable in the general, moonbat candidate (i.e. George McGovern redux) somehow getting the majority of delegates in the primaries and winning the nomination. Seems to me Obama is exactly the sort of situation they came up with Superdelegates to prevent.
The Dems don’t need Rush Limbaught. They produce Operation Chaos all on their own.
“The Dems don’t need Rush Limbaught. They produce Operation Chaos all on their own.”
True but the commentary and the play-by-play is a fun addition.
“If the candidate with the most pledged delegates should win every time, what do the Dems have Superdelegates for? I thought that system was instituted as a firewall against a radical, unelectable in the general, moonbat candidate (i.e. George McGovern redux) somehow getting the majority of delegates in the primaries and winning the nomination. Seems to me Obama is exactly the sort of situation they came up with Superdelegates to prevent.”
Yeah, but the ultra-moonbat wing of the party is trying to change the rules for superdelegates as fast as they can, while simultaneously arguing that MI and FL situation is set in stone. The democrat party will dissolve before our eyes on convention night.