Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
ahhh, I have a question: If the super delegates should just give their votes to the one with the highest delegate count - then why have super delegates at all?

I hope to he*l the sheeple are watching all this typical Socialist chaos and ask themselves: "How could these people run the country? How would they react in time of an emergency?"

16 posted on 03/26/2008 3:48:18 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7
oops - sorry second post - my puter did a “not available” and then double posted...
17 posted on 03/26/2008 3:51:41 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7
... If the super delegates should just give their votes to the one with the highest delegate count - then why have super delegates at all?

The whole purpose of the super delagate is to give the "most electable" candidate the best chance of winning. If, the closer we get to August, OsamaObama's numbers tank and the Hildabeast's rise, the super delegates will most likely vote for Clinton, giving her the nomination. If this happens it won't be pretty - on a number of levels. Blacks and Obama supporters will (understandably) go batshit, and the 'Rats will be forced to expose to the public just how corrupt their super delegate system is.

32 posted on 03/26/2008 4:26:28 PM PDT by LiberConservative (Typical White Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson