To: SmithL
ahhh, I have a question: If the super delegates should just give their votes to the one with the highest delegate count - then why have super delegates at all?
I hope to he*l the sheeple are watching all this typical Socialist chaos and ask themselves: "How could these people run the country? How would they react in time of an emergency?"
16 posted on
03/26/2008 3:48:18 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: maine-iac7
oops - sorry second post - my puter did a “not available” and then double posted...
17 posted on
03/26/2008 3:51:41 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: maine-iac7
... If the super delegates should just give their votes to the one with the highest delegate count - then why have super delegates at all? The whole purpose of the super delagate is to give the "most electable" candidate the best chance of winning. If, the closer we get to August, OsamaObama's numbers tank and the Hildabeast's rise, the super delegates will most likely vote for Clinton, giving her the nomination. If this happens it won't be pretty - on a number of levels. Blacks and Obama supporters will (understandably) go batshit, and the 'Rats will be forced to expose to the public just how corrupt their super delegate system is.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson