Replies

Hey all you folks who decided to vote for this loser because he was “better on the war”. I warned my friends that he’s be just as bad or worse than dems. See - I was right.

Now, let’s talk about his picks for the supreme court . . .

33 posted on 03/26/2008 3:35:49 PM PDT by trenton1776 (The Great Conservative Revolt of '08 is Underway)

His SCOTUS picks?

Ruth Bader Ginsberg II and Ruth Bader Ginsberg III

34 posted on 03/26/2008 3:37:20 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)

Why did you post that to me?

36 posted on 03/26/2008 3:42:11 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Do we want Huma answering the White House phone at 3:00 AM?)

Yep. Unless he has a truly small-government conservative VP, McCain will be the GREATER of two evils come the presidential eleciton. Republicans who vote for him thinking he's the lesser of two evils just because he's got an R behind his name, very much mistake the matter. Certainly Hillary, and likely Obama, as president would be lousy for the U.S. short-term but long-term would be GREAT for limited government conservatism and hence the Republican party, and hence the future of American freedom and prosperity. They would reveal the Democrat party and its Intrusive Government tenets (that McCain and Romney buy into wholeheartedly, by the way) as bankrupt and destructive.

A McCain presidency would be lousy for the U.S. AND for the Republican party and it would SHIELD the Democrat party from being exposed for its utter bankruptcy of ideas. At least there's a decided up-side to an Obama or Hillary presidency. There is ZERO such thing with a McCain presidency.

45 posted on 03/26/2008 4:32:53 PM PDT by Finny (Democrats are Gov't Mommies. Liberal Republicans are Big Gov't Daddies. Conservatives are adults.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794