Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Influential lawmakers see area traffic for themselves

By GORDON DICKSON
Star-Telegram Staff Writer

Posted on Wed, Mar. 26, 2008

FORT WORTH -- A pair of powerful rural lawmakers got a dose of big-city traffic problems Tuesday.

North Texas officials visited with state Reps. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, and Carl Isett, R-Lubbock, for about two hours.

Chisum is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, which controls the purse strings for state agencies. Isett is chairman of the Sunset Advisory Commission, which is studying ways to revamp the Texas Department of Transportation.

The meeting and brief tour of Alliance Airport and surrounding roads was hosted by state Rep. Vicki Truitt, R-Keller, who wants to ensure that plans to improve traffic flow in the western Metroplex aren't hurt by any statewide changes in highway funding.

"Perspective is really important," Truitt said, "and the transportation issues we have in North Texas are vastly different than what exists in West Texas or the Panhandle."

Transportation Department officials have come under fire recently for overestimating available highway funding by $1 billion, proceeding to plan the controversial Trans-Texas Corridor and attempting to lease toll road projects to private, foreign-owned companies.

But in the Fort Worth area, tolls and other alternative funding sources have been embraced on projects such as:

Proposed new toll and nontoll lanes on Interstate 35W in Fort Worth, and Loop 820, Airport Freeway and Texas 114/121 in Northeast Tarrant County.

The planned Southwest Parkway toll road from downtown to southwest Fort Worth and eventually Cleburne.

A proposal to relieve train traffic at the congested Tower 55 railroad intersection near downtown Fort Worth.

Fort Worth Mayor Mike Moncrief and Tarrant County Judge Glen Whitley were among 30 or so people who greeted the lawmakers.

Chisum applauded them for working together and said: "The Legislature itself is incapable of solving the problem without your support. We need you to come to us with the solutions, and we'll assist you in changing the law."


Ogden: Texas can solve the problem of financing road construction

State Sen. Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, TEXAS SENATE
Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Austin American-Statesman

Recently, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), in its effort to address the highway construction needs of our state, alarmed many in the Legislature and many more in my district. This is counter-productive and unnecessary. I want to report to you what can be done to get things back on track.

TxDOT is not "out of money" and can lift its current moratorium on new construction by selling $1.5 billion of voter-approved bonds. Concerns have been raised on repayment of this large sum of money. In response, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, House Speaker Tom Craddick, House Appropriations Chairman Warren Chisum, and myself as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee recently wrote a letter to TxDOT Chairwoman Hope Andrade. We informed her that $300 million has been appropriated to TxDOT for debt service and committed to increase funding for TxDOT in the next biennial budget.

Last November, Texans overwhelmingly approved another $5 billion in general obligation bonds for highway improvements. During the next session, which begins in January, the Legislature will pass a bill authorizing TxDOT to sell these bonds and use the proceeds for new road construction.

Later this month, the Senate Finance Committee will examine additional financing methods. Specifically, I want to explore the possibility of investing a portion of our state's trust funds (i.e., Employees Retirement System, Teachers Retirement System, Permanent School Fund, Permanent University Fund) in TxDOT toll projects. The argument for this is straightforward. If it is such a great idea for foreign companies to invest in and profit from our roads, why isn't it a good idea for our retired teachers and state employees to invest their trust funds in and profit from these roads?

These same trust funds currently make large investments in real estate and infrastructure outside of Texas. I think some of this money should be invested in Texas and that this would be a "win-win-win" situation. Roads will be built, the trust funds will get a guaranteed return on their investment, and the toll revenue would benefit public education in Texas.

The problem of financing the construction of Texas roadways can be solved. The solutions that I propose do not require new taxes, sales to private concerns, or destruction of the countryside with Trans-Texas Corridors a thousand feet wide. Let's stop arguing and get to work on solutions that Texans will support.

Ogden is the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.


State extends comment time for TTC plan to April 18

TxDot wants to hear what you think

1 posted on 03/26/2008 5:37:18 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 03/26/2008 5:38:11 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Go buy Cloverfield when it comes out. No frickin' politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is no reason Interstate 69 could not be built from the Rio Grande Valley to Northeast Texas using existing highways like U.S. 59, most of which are four lane divided rural highways. Upgrading the rural portions to Interstate standards and building freeway bypasses of towns like Victoria, Lufkin, and Nacogdoches would be a far less intrusive and cheaper option than the huge swath proposed in the Trans Texas Corridor. Several existing Texas Interstates, such as I-35 and I-20, incorporate older U.S. highways that were upgraded to Interstate status. Portions of the Grand Parkway around Houston could be used to reroute I-69 around that city if they choose not to use the existing U.S. 59, which is at Interstate standards or better through the Houston metro area.
8 posted on 03/26/2008 6:32:49 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"Within the past several weeks, I have personally attended every TxDOT hearing held in my district regarding this proposed corridor," McReynolds said in a March 18 letter sent to Ed Pensock of TxDOT. "I have also encouraged all to attend and to voice their concerns and to receive answers to their questions. People came, people spoke and the answer is unmistakably clear — I along with 99.9 percent of East Texans adamantly oppose the I-69/TTC.

McReynold's constituents don't matter. Neither do anyone else's. The Texas legislature had transcended constituencies.

10 posted on 03/26/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson