I was pointing out how anti-(fill-in-the-blank) can be created out of whole cloth if one wishes to do so.
You did it, so I illustrated it back to you.
The point was if Coulter's comments were anti-semitic, then yours were anti-Christian. Same skewed method used.
You didn't even get what I was conveying to you.
Regardless of the context in this case, the phrase "told ya so" is used generically all the time, with no need to make it seeped with prejudice as you clearly wanted to see it.
It wasn't done by Coulter, but created by you.
You wanted it to be because he was a Jew, I don't see that as Coulter's intention.
Her mentioning Baptist is part of her being through in her reserch of the parties involved.
If that makes me anti-Christian, then you are way, way, WAY off.
There is my point. If Coulter's statement makes her anti-Jew, then you are way way way WAY off.
(Of course it doesn't make you anti-Christian, any more than her comments make her anti-Jew)
I added an extra "way" for emphasis.
I guess we agree to disagree as to what we saw.
I only brought it up because I never see Ann mention Clinton’s religion or Kennedy’s religion in any context to their behavior. So why mention Spitzer’s a Jew at all?
What was the point?