Skip to comments.
Dick Morris: Obama Must Fight Back [Clintons trying to steal nomination]
NewsMax.com ^
| 11 Mar 08
| Dick Morris & Eileen McGann
Posted on 03/12/2008 5:43:49 AM PDT by seanmerc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
The Clintons are trying to steal something? I'm SHOCKED! SHOCKED, I tell you!
1
posted on
03/12/2008 5:43:50 AM PDT
by
seanmerc
To: seanmerc
Hillary successfully stealing the nomination is the best assurance of a McCain victory in November. The backlash will rock the Dems to their (hollow) core.
2
posted on
03/12/2008 5:46:43 AM PDT
by
william clark
(DH4WH08 - Ecclesiastes 10:2)
To: william clark
Right you are! Rat-on-Rat fRATricide is the ideal outcome of all this.
3
posted on
03/12/2008 5:48:33 AM PDT
by
seanmerc
To: william clark
4
posted on
03/12/2008 5:50:42 AM PDT
by
seanmerc
To: seanmerc
This was apparently written before the Mississippi primary where Obama thrashed Hillary(god I just love to watch her lose), again. lol
5
posted on
03/12/2008 5:51:41 AM PDT
by
KoRn
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: seanmerc
To: seanmerc
The solution for Obama is clear: Reply in kind, but do it through surrogates. Man, that is so Dick Morris.
In a way, he's kind of refreshing. Most weasly politicos like to pretend they're forthcoming and honest up front. The toe-licker doesn't even bother with pretending.
7
posted on
03/12/2008 5:55:01 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: william clark
"Hillary successfully stealing the nomination is the best assurance of a McCain victory in November. The backlash will rock the Dems to their (hollow) core." And fortunately, the Beast at least attempting to steal the nomination is money in the bank. There is simply no way on God's green earth that she isn't going to try.
8
posted on
03/12/2008 5:56:10 AM PDT
by
libs_kma
(The land of the free, because of the brave)
To: seanmerc
Democrats have a major dilemma:
should they vote for a nut with two boobs or a boob with two nuts.
To: seanmerc
If O'bomma H Yo-momma responds "in kind", the Clintons will respond with the Ft. Marcy park option, and O'bama knows it.
It is better to stay alive to fight another day....
10
posted on
03/12/2008 6:00:57 AM PDT
by
B.O. Plenty
(Give war a chance......)
To: seanmerc
11
posted on
03/12/2008 6:01:30 AM PDT
by
newheart
(The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
To: seanmerc
McCain, and by extension the Republican’s only hope is that Hillary gets the nomination, not Barack Obama. If the toe sucker got one right every once in a while, he’d know that. Since Obama is far to the left of Hillary, I don’t see an Obama victory as a good thing for America by any means, especially given Obama’s close association with racists, bigots, anarchists, America haters, and extremist leftists that make Hillary look like a member of the John Birch Society.
To: dead
Like Sinbad; that WaPo interview was a hoot
13
posted on
03/12/2008 6:04:25 AM PDT
by
sobieski
To: RexFamilia
“should they vote for a nut with two boobs or a boob with two nuts.”
LOL.
To: seanmerc
The scenario nobody has yet mentioned is that Obama somehow manages to get the nomination.
Then, the Clintons will proceed to use their machine to cut the legs out of his presidential campaign, in order to give Hillary a run against an elderly McCain, in 2012.
This is the ultimate doomsday pathway for the Clintons - their final trump card. Sure, it breaks all the boundaries of common sense and decency. So what?
15
posted on
03/12/2008 6:12:31 AM PDT
by
horse_doc
(Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
To: seanmerc
but you know if obama fights back, hillary will fight back even harder. and with surrogates
16
posted on
03/12/2008 6:13:37 AM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
To: seanmerc
Well, as much as the Toe Sucker has attacked Her Thighness over the past several years (and his inside knowledge of what happens to those who step on Clintoon toes) he has every reason to work towards her defeat.
Other than that, Moris is a has-been with 0 credibility.
17
posted on
03/12/2008 6:14:10 AM PDT
by
Conservative Vermont Vet
(One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All)
To: horse_doc
And you know she’d do it, too. After the sort of stuff she’s pulled so far, I can’t picture Obama appointing her as VP (if she’d even take it if he did). And that’ll just tick her off even more. And we’ve already seen plenty of signs that she’d rather McCain win this time than Obama so she can face him in four years (such as her comments about how she has a lot of experience, McCain has a lot of experience, and Obama only has a speech).
Expect her to be smiling at Obama to his face while stabbing him in the back.
To: william clark
The real problem is the Dems have almost completely destroyed the electoral process, and crippled faith in democracy. It’s no longer about the People picking those with the best ideas, it’s all about power and lies and elitism.
19
posted on
03/12/2008 6:20:30 AM PDT
by
Clock King
(Bring the noise!)
To: seanmerc
I thought that Morris said a few days ago that it’s over for Hillary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson