Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Highest Density Fuel Cell: Violet Fuel Cell Stick
business wire ^ | 3/7/08 | uncited

Posted on 03/10/2008 8:49:33 AM PDT by dangerdoc

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, green high-tech venture VioletTM Fuel Cell SticksTM www.violetfuelcellsticks.com announces it has achieved an extremely high, 15KW/Liter cell density with their Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) StickTM. Previous commercial fuel cells, including both SOFCs and PEMs, have struggled to meet a target of 2KW/Liter; and previous advanced concepts have struggled to achieve 4KW/Liter. The VioletTM StickTM has overcome the most significant hurdles facing fuel cells, and it resolves the technical limitations of existing technologies, such as sealing, cracking and manifolding problems, and poor volumetric density.

StickTM technology, created by VioletTM Fuel Cell SticksTM, offers a fundamental change to the physical structure of SOFCs that enables, for the first time, high density, low cost, mass produced solid state engines. The SOFC StickTM solves decades-old commercialization challenges for SOFC technology. The technology opens the door to mass production for numerous applications, such as: large-scale power generation, small-scale distributed power, auxiliary power units, mobile power generation, automotive, flight and advanced vehicle concepts.

“We believe that this is the highest density, scalable fuel cell in the world, and we are confident that we can quickly go much higher,” said co-founder Alan Devoe.

The development of the VioletTM StickTM is expected to have a significant impact on the US Fuel Cell market, which is estimated to be $1.1 billion US today and expected to grow to as much as $18.6 billion in 2013.

For a full description of the technology, visit www.violetfuelcellsticks.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
This is the type of breakthrough that may put an end to the internal combustion engine.

It would be about three times more efficient than gas IC and about twice that of diesel IC. SOFC can burn diesel, gasoline, ethanol, methanol and convert it effiently into electricity.

A real, normal sized car would get about 70 mpg and a real pickup would get about 40 mpg.

Portable generators would weigh about 1/3 as much and generate about 5 times the electricity per gallon of gasoline.

1 posted on 03/10/2008 8:49:35 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Will it fit into my car’s usb slot?


2 posted on 03/10/2008 8:54:26 AM PDT by appeal2 (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
When I can buy a drop in at Auto Zone, THAT will be news.
3 posted on 03/10/2008 8:59:14 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
A real, normal sized car would get about 70 mpg and a real pickup would get about 40 mpg.

We'll see, but this would go well beyond the CAFE standards. I guarantee the Democrats and environmentalists would take credit for it, though.

4 posted on 03/10/2008 9:01:33 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Generators? What do you need a generator for? It’s my understanding that a fuel cell IS A GENERATOR.

I’m waiting for batteries to get practical. THen we can run our cars on electricity from nukes and tell the middle east to go away.


5 posted on 03/10/2008 9:02:18 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
This is the type of breakthrough that may put an end to the internal combustion engine.

(Or not.)

6 posted on 03/10/2008 9:03:04 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Unless nanotube batteries are able to be produced in massive quantities I think battery technology is more or less maxed for now. As far as fuel cells being generators, they are except this one generates electricity through carbon based fuels as its source. Normal hydrogen based fuel cells are prohibitively expensive to produce because it takes alot of energy to extract hydrogen, so the trade off as of now isnt worth it.


7 posted on 03/10/2008 9:11:01 AM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

bump


8 posted on 03/10/2008 9:13:04 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Is Barak HUSSEIN Obama the Anti-Christ? "Barak Ho-Tep!! Barak Ho-Tep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

“Generators? What do you need a generator for? It’s my understanding that a fuel cell IS A GENERATOR.”

????

I use a gasoline generator as emergency backup. I would love to have one of these connected to my propane tank for emergencies.


9 posted on 03/10/2008 9:16:11 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect

“When I can buy a drop in at Auto Zone, THAT will be news.”

That’s the whole point, a fuel cell with enough output to run a car now is the size of a car.

This is an easy to manufacture, robust fuel cell that will fit in the engine compartment and run off gasoline.


10 posted on 03/10/2008 9:18:32 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

You do know they make internal combustion engines that run on propane, or even natural gas, right?


11 posted on 03/10/2008 9:28:46 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

I thought that stability was the most important problem with these high energy batteries; i.e. these exploding laptops. Also, these batteries tend to degrade very quickly, i.e. about 2 years for most laptops.

An unstable high energy battery would go up a lot like a 4th of July firework. It would put a Pinto to shame, but might make rush hour more colorful.


12 posted on 03/10/2008 9:30:38 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

I’m going to take a guess and say this company is a scam.


13 posted on 03/10/2008 9:31:06 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Point of reference: 15 kW = 20 horsepower. So at 15 kW/liter, you'd need 15 liters (4 gallons) to provide the 300-odd horsepower provided by a 5.4 liter V8, as found in a Ford F-150 pickup.

To be honest, I don't really know what that power density rating actually means. Specifically, how much energy (power * time) does the number represent? How does one compare it to automotive fuel efficiency?

14 posted on 03/10/2008 9:37:15 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Yep, about 15% efficient when you factor in power delivered to the wheels.

This should be about 50% efficient power to wheel. A huge improvement and enough to decrease our fuel imports.


15 posted on 03/10/2008 9:43:02 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

A three hundred horse power engine is probably only good for about 100 hp continious duty.

You need the huge engine for peak output which can be accomplished by including a small battery pack and to make up for poor low end torque which all IC engine have.

An IC engine has no torque at zero RPM. An electric motor has maximum torque at zero RPM.

If you have a battery pack, a 30 kw fuel cell would provide all the performance of any sized engine you would want to put into a street legal car and drive in a way that would not get you thrown in jail. 20 kW would probably be enough with an appropriately sized battery pack.

100 kw would provide all of the hauling performance found in a production pickup.

Don’t get confused by rated horsepower on engines. They will not put out that power for sustained duration. A huge farm tractor will only be rated at 120 hp but have the displacement of a Viper. The difference is the farm tractor rating is based on continious duty, the 600 hp viper is based on peak output.

The power rating is based on output. One kilowatt for one hour is a kilowatt hour.

A gasoline engine is about 30% efficient at the optimum RMP. Using suboptimal RPMs and factoring in various loses, modern gasoline cars are 15% effiecient. About one out of seven gallons of gas you put in the car actually move it, the rest just heats the air, tires, and pavement.

A SOFC is about 60% efficient and about 90% of that drives the wheels. The heat given off is mostly high quality heat which could be used for other purposes when used in stationary applications.


16 posted on 03/10/2008 9:58:54 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

This is not a battery pack. Fuel and air are fed into the cell which are “burned”. Instead of producting mechanical energy, the power creates electricity directly.

It would be no more likely to explode that your lawnmower engine.

You are talking about Li-ion batteries, this has nothing in common.


17 posted on 03/10/2008 10:02:20 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

dangerdoc is talking about backup power for a home or office, not a motor vehicle.


18 posted on 03/10/2008 10:02:50 AM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Since they are talking about energy density, I’m thinking that they mean the amount of electricity generated for a given volume of fuel cell. IOW, a 10cm x 10cm x 10cm cube (1 liter), will generate 15 kW.

The beauty of SOFC’s are that they are tolerant of impurities in the fuel. Material issues have always been the key hurdle for SOFC’s. When I was involved with fuel cells 20 years ago, SOFCs were made of ceramics, and thus would not work well in an automotive application.


19 posted on 03/10/2008 10:03:33 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 3niner

So am I. Jeeze, you people are dense.


20 posted on 03/10/2008 10:07:51 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson