Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MPs back artificial sperm for childless[UK]
The Observer ^ | 09 Mar 2008 | Gaby Hinsliff

Posted on 03/09/2008 9:38:38 AM PDT by BGHater

· Law change could help cancer victims · embryo bill fuels impassioned debate

Mps are planning a change in the law to allow babies to be conceived from artificial sperm, a move described by opponents as playing God with human DNA.

A furious debate is building over how far to leave the door open to its use in IVF treatment, ahead of a Commons vote due shortly on the government's Human Fertilisation and Embryology bill. The legislation currently allows ...#8239;so-called artificial gametes in research, but imposes a blanket ban on their use in creating a human pregnancy.

The technique involves the creation in a lab of sperm grown from embryonic cells taken from the would-be parent. Although the science is in its infancy, it could ultimately help people rendered infertile by cancer treatment, or fortysomething women who can no longer produce their own eggs, to have children who are genetically related to them.

A cross-party group of MPs led by Liberal Democrat Evan Harris will table an amendment to relax the ban. 'There is no good explanation for not allowing this option for people who have survived cancer and cannot have children,' Harris told The Observer. 'This is a good bill, but the government needs to recognise a few improvements are still needed - such as allowing the use of artificial gametes - before we can say the UK has rational and progressive regulation.'

Dawn Primarolo, the Public Health Minister, confirmed last night that she was considering pleas from MPs and scientists to relax the ban. There was a 'powerful argument' that the new technique could help solve a shortage of sperm donors, she said, but she was sympathetic to arguments that a decision should not be rushed.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: artificial; bioethics; father; sperm; spermbank; uk

1 posted on 03/09/2008 9:38:39 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Hey folks, instead of funding Frankenbabies, why not spend a little more money on adoption??? I’m just sayin’...


2 posted on 03/09/2008 9:47:11 AM PDT by AirForceBrat23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Isn’t this a bit like counting your chickens before they hatch?? How many babies have been actually born and studied for birth defects, problems, etc. arising from this procedure?? I haven’t heard of a single child yet!

Sounds very much like the argument the embryonic stem cell research people use, that stem cells will heal ALL problems out there—yet there’s no documented research after all this time that it actually *does*, is there?

Hello?? Anyone? Bueller???


3 posted on 03/09/2008 9:55:48 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Isn’t there enough donated sperm out there?

Good grief!!!!


4 posted on 03/09/2008 10:04:37 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Everybody wants to be God. It’s a sick world.


5 posted on 03/09/2008 10:08:50 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (With all this voter fraud, being able to vote has become overrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Perhaps this isn’t playing God...just using the knowledge that God gave us.


6 posted on 03/09/2008 10:39:59 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Artificial sperm. Great. Are they doing this in livestock yet? That’s where it should stay, down at the farm.


7 posted on 03/09/2008 10:42:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Infertile? No problem, we will just clone a perfect blend of you and your husband! Don’t like his honkin nose? Don’t worry, we will blend that out. Think her brains are a little on the dense side? That can go too!

So what if there are millions of babies who needs homes. The important thing is that you get what you WANT.


8 posted on 03/09/2008 10:47:37 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: BGHater
I know that artificial sperm comes from stem cells, but I still think it sounds like it ought to come from a dildo.

(No! Bad Rich!)

10 posted on 03/09/2008 11:24:21 AM PDT by RichInOC (...William Frank Buckley, Jr., November 24, 1925-February 27, 2008, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
Although, that said...Bill Clinton's a dildo, and he seems to have no problem producing the real thing.

(NO! BAD Rich!)
(What'd I say?)

11 posted on 03/09/2008 11:37:55 AM PDT by RichInOC (...William Frank Buckley, Jr., November 24, 1925-February 27, 2008, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AirForceBrat23; ridesthemiles; Southerngl

To have biological, genetic progeny, is life’s most powerful instinct and desire. However harsh it may sound, anything else, is a substitute.


12 posted on 03/09/2008 11:41:18 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
To have biological, genetic progeny, is life’s most powerful instinct and desire. However harsh it may sound, anything else, is a substitute.

Coupled to that is the fact that--thanks to some boneheaded judicial decisions--one's own biological progeny are the only children to which one can really be assured no other individual will try to claim title (though the state may try to claim title regardless).

13 posted on 03/09/2008 2:51:38 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr; BGHater

No, it’s not playing God. It’s failing to play human.


14 posted on 03/19/2008 4:12:03 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Make Love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

How could someone fail to play human?


15 posted on 03/20/2008 5:40:30 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
"How could someone fail to play human?"

Oh, there are many, many ways for somebody to fail to play human. By conceiving human children without making love, for one. By conceiving them without two parents, a father and a mother, for two. By conceiving them even without human sperm, for three.

By taking all the necessary steps toward making a child a commodity, an expensive hobby, a lifestyle accessory, a totally manufactured product, instead of a gift of human love. That's a key way you can fail to play human.

16 posted on 03/20/2008 6:23:00 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I guess we differ in some of our views. Thanks


17 posted on 03/20/2008 7:40:10 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson