Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“The problem, laid out in two new studies in the journal Science, is that it takes a lot of land to grow biofuel feedstocks such as corn, and as forests or grasslands are cleared for crops”

An outright lie. Cropland has always been cropland. There is little to no land being used for crop production that hasn’t already been used for crops before.

There is more CO2 being emitted from lack of proper forest management, allowing tens of millions of acres of vegetated land to burn rampantly. Wild fires are a total mismanagement of timber resources that could effectively reduce CO2 naturally. Burning off the forests makes no sense. But the environmental freakos can overlook wildfires.

Yet they are crying about some cropland that produces corn that is processed into ethanol, and high protein corn feed byproducts.
What a crock of BS.


9 posted on 03/09/2008 9:46:58 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: o_zarkman44

Dumb move on their part. There are a lot of reasons to be against ethanol. Yet, they always seem to focus on imaginary reasons.


10 posted on 03/09/2008 9:50:09 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson