Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First American Primate Scurried In Through Alaska
New Scientist ^ | 3-3-2008 | Andy Coghlan

Posted on 03/04/2008 11:10:22 AM PST by blam

First American primate scurried in through Alaska

22:00 03 March 2008
NewScientist.com news service
Andy Coghlan

Fossil teeth of the mouse-sized monkey were found in Mississippi and dated to around 55 million years ago (Illustration: Mark A. Klingler/CMNH)

The primate's teeth indicate that it lived on a diet of fruit and berries (Image: Joe Suhan/CMU and Mark A Klingler/CMNH)

It was only the size of a mouse, but it has the distinction of being the first primate to scurry into the New World.

Fossilised teeth of the monkey Teilhardina magnoliana have been found in rocks in Mississippi. They were dated as younger than its Asian relatives, but more ancient than those already found in Europe and North America.

The monkey must have colonised the Americas via Alaska, crossing from Asia via the Bering land bridge 55 million years ago, says Chris Beard of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh.

Analysis of the teeth suggests America's first primate enjoyed a diet of fruit and insects.

Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.071080105)

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alaska; american; eocene; globalwarminghoax; monkey; paleocene; petm; primate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2008 11:10:24 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

He was immediately offered free housing, health care and college tuition by a welcoming committee of Democratic cavemen.


2 posted on 03/04/2008 11:22:08 AM PST by relictele (Liberal: one who walks away from a TSA queue still convinced government can solve problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Scurried?

The article offers nothing to reason .. scurrying.

3 posted on 03/04/2008 11:28:42 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele
How do you know it was a he?

Could'a been one of those females fleeing an iminent honor killing ... that would explain the 'scurrying'.

4 posted on 03/04/2008 11:33:37 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
The monkey must have colonised the Americas via Alaska, crossing from Asia via the Bering land bridge 55 million years ago,

Why does everyone - well, most everyone - still cling to the theory that anything in the Americas had to have come over the loop and DOWN into North America?

There's still that old belief that hangs on due to the "Old Worlds" people not knowing that the "New World" existed - which it did all those millions of years that the Old one die = that everything in the New World had to have gotten here from the Old.

Who's to say that some things may well have gone up and over the Straight FROM the "New" world to the old?

Take, for example, the camel.

The camel originated in North America and once lived in the Yukon and Alaska - long before the 'ice bridge' =

But scientists and establishment archaeologists still start with the premise that everything had to have come FROM the Old World - which isn't any older than the New World...even against the evidence that not only was Clovis man here long before the Bering Straight bridge - but so were others, as far south as South America - at least a millennia before the Bering Straight bridge -

But, as we have witnessed, once a scientist - particularly archaeologists - have a well entrenched theory, they're like a dog with a bone - devil take the evidence staring them in the face.

5 posted on 03/04/2008 11:52:05 AM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
More stupid guessing on the Darwin idiosyncrasy. A boned found in Mississippi and they think it went to Europe afterwards.....for what crumpets and tea? No....the species was intercontinental. The facts show it was found in other parts of the world.
6 posted on 03/04/2008 11:52:37 AM PST by Wavrnr10 (Eagles soar but weasels don't get sucked in jet engines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

“An exasperated Barack Obama scurried away . . .”


7 posted on 03/04/2008 11:53:51 AM PST by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
first primate enjoyed a diet of fruit and insects.

i'm not sure enjoyed is the most apporpriate word, perhaps "had" is better.

8 posted on 03/04/2008 11:54:49 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why wasn’t it found in California?


9 posted on 03/04/2008 11:55:04 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Analysis of the teeth suggests America's first primate enjoyed a diet of fruit and insects.

Clearly they settled first in California.

10 posted on 03/04/2008 12:05:29 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

“How do you know it was a he?”

Really—my first guess was that this was about Helen Thomas.


11 posted on 03/04/2008 12:05:30 PM PST by Mac from Cleveland (All generalities are false--including this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Or populated S. America when it was connected to Africa. Rode over on the continent.

Unless the climate in N. Siberia and Alaska was very different than now, I can’t see some of these animals surviving the winters during a migration across the ‘land bridge’.


12 posted on 03/04/2008 12:15:27 PM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

And evolved into the local San Francisco hippie, where the diet is occassionally suplemented by dumpster diving and organic weeds.


13 posted on 03/04/2008 12:19:08 PM PST by tbw2 (Libertarian sci-fi without Heinlein's free love - "Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" - amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mac from Cleveland
Mpfffhhht .... !

You owe me a keyboard.

14 posted on 03/04/2008 12:20:07 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Rode over on the continent.

That's a great phrase! And, I imagine, scientifically valid

15 posted on 03/04/2008 12:40:42 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

“Unless the climate in N. Siberia and Alaska was very different than now”

It was very different.

http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/current/1999/090299/Arctic.html


16 posted on 03/04/2008 12:51:58 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7; Vinnie
"Or populated S. America when it was connected to Africa. Rode over on the continent."

That was 120 million years ago.

17 posted on 03/04/2008 1:20:29 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
That was 120 million years ago.

yeah - and the same 'building blocks' would've 'rode over' as stayed put, would they not?

18 posted on 03/04/2008 1:49:37 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Vinnie - forgot to include you in my answer to our mutual poster, blam =

he/she said to us: "That was 120 million years ago.

And I answered: "yeah - and the same 'building blocks' would've 'rode over' as stayed put, would they not?"

19 posted on 03/04/2008 1:53:11 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
"yeah - and the same 'building blocks' would've 'rode over' as stayed put, would they not?"

No. When something seperates and goes in two different directions, the two halves start mutating in different directions and eventually become two different 'things.'

20 posted on 03/04/2008 2:22:46 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson