Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCFRoadWarrior

It’s rather evident our leadership couldn’t care less about our national security. Saudi student visas, open borders, subsidizing R&D in foreign nations, forgoing our own R&D as it relates to space and other technologies, moving our manufacturing and other jobs offshore. Of course there’s the globalist multi-nation security agreements and trade governances that will eventually supercede our own government along with the A.U. nonsense coming into play along they way.

If you were Soviet Russia during the cold war or Iran today, you couldn’t devise a better plant to take the U.S. down. And what the hell, you could get a large segment of conservatives to vote for it, just to make sure the democrats didn’t destroy us.


5 posted on 03/03/2008 9:21:18 PM PST by DoughtyOne (We've got Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber left. Name them in order. I dare ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Wouldn’t it be better to question why Boeing was unable to produce a better product than Northrup-Grumman?

If the Air Force believes NG produces a better aircraft that serves the need of the U.S. military than so be it. I’m all for our armed forces receiving that absolute finest aircraft, whether it be made solely in the U.S. or partially overseas.


6 posted on 03/03/2008 9:31:03 PM PST by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

I suppose they could have awarded it to Boeing and then the plane would still be partially built overseas. Get a grip.


12 posted on 03/04/2008 4:10:57 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson