Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/03/2008 2:01:07 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 03/03/2008 2:01:48 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The TTC is a part of a 4,000-mile system of rail lines, truck and car lanes and concentrated utility routes to improve international and intrastate movement of goods and people from Canada to the border of Mexico.

Actually, if it is fully built out, ALL of the TTC will be located in Texas. I-69, however, will connect Canada and Mexico.

3 posted on 03/03/2008 2:04:19 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Major tin foil hat here but is Ted Turner set to gain by giving up some of his land for this so called corridor?
4 posted on 03/03/2008 2:04:55 PM PST by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The people of Texas and the country are having the North American Union shoved down their throats.


5 posted on 03/03/2008 2:05:03 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

You know, just a thought came to mind here. If a highway corridor (like I-69) is such an important artery for the movement of goods from Canada to Mexican Ports etc, then wouldn’t that single highway be also considered a high priority target by an enemy wishing to disrupt those same shipping routes?
It seems putting all the eggs in one basket could be a serious blunder under certain scenarios.
Kansas City is a part of this same concept of the NAFTA highway because it would serve as a port of entry (go figure) operated by Mexico within sovergn US borders.
The money people are pushing it. The citizenry is in opposition. Who is going to end up winning at who’s expense?
Just some thoughts here.


9 posted on 03/03/2008 2:43:46 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson