[wmileo]

OK! your points are very well thought out. But elections come down to making choices. GW Bush is done. Thompson and Hunter are out of the race. Ronald Reagan is with his maker.

Given that the WOT is the most important challenge we face in the Twenty First Century, which candidate of the remaining three or four is the best fit for Commander in Chief?

[Man50D]

GW Bush is done. Thompson and Hunter are out of the race.

Ceding your Conservative principles in the name of compromise to support a candidate who has sided with the Socialist Democrats solely for the sake of winning an election only advances the Socialist cause. It is a loser strategy as evident by the Socialist Democrats taking control of Congress in 2006. The clear answer is to hold to Conservative principles by writing in a Conservative candidate or voting for one from another party.

Given that the WOT is the most important challenge we face in the Twenty First Century, which candidate of the remaining three or four is the best fit for Commander in Chief?

That's exactly my point! None are the "best fit" because they all support amnesty for illegal aliens! Allowing illegals to stay in this country will be our downfall! You need to look past the "R" or "D" after a candidate's name and examine their political ideology. In doing so you would realize McCain, Obama and Clinton are all Socialists!

[Bull Market]

“Given that the WOT is the most important challenge we face in the Twenty First Century, which candidate of the remaining three or four is the best fit for Commander in Chief?”

Hillary. By far.