Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/28/2008 1:17:10 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Nancy Pelosi is deeply disturbed.


2 posted on 02/28/2008 1:17:48 PM PST by SmithL (That's my story & I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

ahh heck...why don’t some republicans call for an investigation of Pelosi? Just for the fun of it?

Why doesn’t our side just make up stuff so we can have fake investigations?


3 posted on 02/28/2008 1:19:35 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
‘Nancy’ NEVER heard of ‘Separation of Powers’...
DB
5 posted on 02/28/2008 1:24:24 PM PST by geo40xyz ((McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Nostrildumbass to the rescue !


6 posted on 02/28/2008 1:31:26 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

big issue is the environment. She always makes statements that, with us, the environment is not an issue, it’s an ethic, it’s a value. Which is a nice way of saying, “I love the environment, but not when it comes to our own businesses.”

in 1996, Nancy Pelosi and her husband and fewer than 10 other partners wanted to build a golf course and country club outside of San Jose, California, called the CordeValle Country Club.

They never followed the environmental regulations. The ponds were never built for these endangered species. For seven years, they also failed to file any of the environmental reports required by the California Fish and Wildlife Commission.

A 2004 County Environmental Compliance Report found all kinds of environmental problems on the Pelosi’s golf course.

What does that actually mean in practical terms? Did they turn around and build this habitat and comply?

No, they solved the problem the old-fashioned way: they hired lobbyists and they got the environmental regulations changed.


7 posted on 02/28/2008 1:32:10 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Don’t monitor terrorists but investigate White house and baseball steroid use. My!!! I feel safer already./s


8 posted on 02/28/2008 1:32:49 PM PST by Know et al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

HEY NANCY! please work on legislation and forget about “investigating” someone.....time to do your work....


9 posted on 02/28/2008 1:33:14 PM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

No wonder Congress can never get anything done. Pelosi’s too busy with her blankety blank investigations!!!!


10 posted on 02/28/2008 1:34:52 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Nancy, Bolton and Miers are not enemies of the US. But, achmed, habib, mohammad, osama obama, and other muslims are enemies and failure to keep fisa from expiring has made it easier for those who want to harm us....


11 posted on 02/28/2008 1:35:11 PM PST by The Forgotten Man (He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
This biatch insists on continually embarrassing herself.......
12 posted on 02/28/2008 1:35:57 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (My tagline fell & it can't get up..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Put a sock in it Nancy. We’re about done with your crap...


14 posted on 02/28/2008 1:36:31 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just out of curiosity, I wonder what the MSM reaction would be to a headline saying, “Bush wants Pelosi aids investigated.”?


15 posted on 02/28/2008 1:36:43 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

yawwwnnn


16 posted on 02/28/2008 1:39:15 PM PST by italianquaker (Hussein is his middle name, maybe his parents should apologize for it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

There she goes again....Putting on stage acts for her radical left base! Sit down Pelosi, even they think you are full of crap!


17 posted on 02/28/2008 1:40:27 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Bush deserves this. Look what happened when he caved on investigating the Rockefeller memo on Democrats using the Intelligence Committee to drag Bush through investigations. Instead of investigating, he had Manual Miranda thrown under the bus.

Just like with the terrorists, the Democrats were simply emboldened to investigate, investigate, investigate until November 2008.

-PJ

19 posted on 02/28/2008 1:41:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Go piss up a rope, lady!


21 posted on 02/28/2008 1:44:15 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I want an investigation into if Pelosi can be forced to pay for the costs of these idiotic investigations.

The only point of these investigations is political theater.

The only way the issue of if the administration is required to turn over the documents or to testify is for congress to sue the administration and have the courts decide.

Even if her politically motivated investigation comes to the predetermined answer that they could be charged, it is the justice department that would file charges if they choose to do so, not congress.

So this would be a huge waste of time and money just to determine if the committee feels that members of the administration could be charged with misdemeanors if the administration chose to charge them. If the administration wants to charge them, it could do so without the investigation, and the investigation has no authority to force the administration to do so on its own. The investigation is completely pointless except for whatever political sound bytes it might produce.

Either sue the administration in court, or move on to other business.

24 posted on 02/28/2008 1:48:22 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

good time to start reading the history of the soviet union.


26 posted on 02/28/2008 1:49:58 PM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

How about it if instead the US Attorney General investigates the illegal employment of foreign nationals at the vineyard controlled by Nancy Stretchface and her family?


28 posted on 02/28/2008 1:57:49 PM PST by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Lord, this woman s completely insane!

She had to dig the dead horse up in order to beat it!

29 posted on 02/28/2008 2:01:15 PM PST by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson