Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/25/2008 3:54:57 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

I never knew what to make of the whole cellphone-leads-to-health-issues thing. Even so, I’ve always used a wired headset because (1) my hearing isn’t the greatest, (2) my old cellphone used to get *very* hot when used for more than 20 minutes, and (3) I need to keep my hands free for drinking coffee, corraling children, and bestowing affection upon the spousal unit. :-)


2 posted on 02/25/2008 3:58:08 PM PST by Digital Sniper (Hello, "Undocumented Immigrant." I'm an "Undocumented Border Patrol Agent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
What brand, make and model of cell phone did they use for this experiment?

What? You mean they didn’t use the typical shielded FCC approved mobile device? I’m shocked, shocked at this...

3 posted on 02/25/2008 3:59:42 PM PST by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Bump


4 posted on 02/25/2008 4:00:45 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The human race will become extinct because cell phones are worn around the whoopie areas.


5 posted on 02/25/2008 4:01:20 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“Radiation From Mobile Phones Changes Protein Expression In Living People, Study Suggests”

I am still trying to figure out that sentence. Why would dead people be using a cell phone?.


6 posted on 02/25/2008 4:02:01 PM PST by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

7 posted on 02/25/2008 4:02:12 PM PST by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I know cell phone use by my daughter effects intelligent expression.


8 posted on 02/25/2008 4:04:24 PM PST by lawnguy (You have a republic, if you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

at some point down the road (years? decades?) the manufacturers are going to lose their grip on the publication/recognition (in the US, at any rate) of medical issues involved extensive use of cell phones, and they are going to be hounded like the tobacco companies by lawyers.


9 posted on 02/25/2008 4:06:54 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Bump; If cell phone radiation is “harmful” on some small level, then soon EMF radiation from power lines will be deemed to be “harmful,” then television & radio transmissions will be deemed harmful (I always knew they would put a stop to right-wing talk radio & the Fox News channel), then..... oh well.

Let’s hope that good studies are done and well thought out science is performed that provide comparisons of the risk to other risks taken freely in our society.

10 posted on 02/25/2008 4:08:09 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I think it’s unlikely that cellphone makers thought there might be serious health issues with their product.

But I can’t help but think they never imagined a whole lot of people would keep them stuck to their heads for hours and hours every day.

I personally know of three people in my small town who have had brain tumors removed over the past few years. All of the tumors were located behind the right ear.


12 posted on 02/25/2008 4:09:29 PM PST by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

It’s time to PUNISH cell phone users for thier callous disregard for their health, much like smokers and obese people.

SIN TAX on all cell phones and calls made.

INCREASE HEALTH and LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

/S


14 posted on 02/25/2008 4:14:15 PM PST by Mother Mary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Maybe if people didn’t have their cellphone glued to their head 24x7 it wouldn’t be an issue.

Just maybe.


15 posted on 02/25/2008 4:15:33 PM PST by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Changes Protein Expression

Phones have expressions?

How about bluetooth ear pieces, much worse I am sure.

18 posted on 02/25/2008 4:21:26 PM PST by BillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Image hosted by Photobucket.com can "Secondhand Radiation" be far behind???
20 posted on 02/25/2008 4:30:22 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Radiation From Mobile Phones Changes Protein Expression In Living People

So does sunlight.
22 posted on 02/25/2008 4:36:01 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The analysis of 580 proteins identified 8 proteins that were statistically significantly affected.

"Statistical significance is a statement about conditional probability, nothing else. It does not guarantee that something important, or even meaningful, has been found." - Hays and Winkler, STATISTICS

Almost every "study" that you hear of hangs its hat on statistical significance without mentioning STRENGTH of correlation. That is, how strongly were the results correlated with the test variables? Often, the correlation is very weak, so that in many cases the individual results were in fact opposite to the affect being touted.

The quoted caveat is pointing out that the inferences are based on a hypothetical model, and the statistical significance test says that this model, which is governed by pure randomness, is unlikely to some high degree to produce the given result.

24 posted on 02/25/2008 10:53:24 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I refuse to own or use a cellphone, I firmly believe there is so much money involved that they will do anything to say they are safe.

cellphones to me are more dangerous than mis-handled guns, yes they have their usefulness but the users approach is just not hitting the mark yet.


25 posted on 02/25/2008 11:10:52 PM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“A more extensive study with 50-100 volunteers is now planned at STUK.”

I’m sure there will be. Especially if they all have to slip into a skimpy black negligee. (Well - at least the gals!).


26 posted on 02/25/2008 11:19:39 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson