Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/20/2008 3:50:15 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
Attacking the "wrong terrorists" in the "wrong country"? What are these academic hacks smoking? There are no "wrong terrorists." There are no "wrong countries." All terrorists have it coming. So do all countries which harbor them.

If there ever is any type of nuclear attack on the US, all of them will get it. And, it would be advisable for all of America's college professors not to get in the way, when that happens.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Running for Congress, Expecting to Win"

A Freeper in Congress? Now's the time.

2 posted on 02/20/2008 3:58:12 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Yes, because Iran is going to let you “trace” all of their nuclear material so we know for sure that they’re the ones that did it.

I must be a complete idiot because the news lately makes me question the IQ of the presumably intelligent people in our country. I’m no rocket scientist after all.


3 posted on 02/20/2008 3:59:30 PM PST by TheZMan (I'm going to write my own name on the ballot. Screw the current crop of "conservatives".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Acting on sketchy information, the president orders an attack, but it turns out to be the wrong terrorists, in the wrong country.

If the president orders the elimination of terrorists in such as scenario, how could they be the "wrong terrorists, in the wrong country"? They may not be the group that detonated the device, but under the circumstances described, the president should eliminate all known terrorist groups--and anyone unfortunate enough to be standing within 25 miles of such groups. As for the country harboring such a group, its leaders know the risks of sleeping with cobras.

U.S. policy should be that we will take out the following targets if a weapon of mass destruction is used against the U.S. or its allies. The list should frighten the al-Saud clan because it will turn their Red Sea coast into glass--and it should frighten those nations who harbor terrorists--for example, the Palestinians--because they will all cease to exist. The only way to deal with terrorists is to kill them.

5 posted on 02/20/2008 4:03:31 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Its simple really. They kill a million of us, we kill 100 million of them. Stick to or improve on that ratio and the war will soon be over.


8 posted on 02/20/2008 4:52:54 PM PST by DogBarkTree (The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos; CodeToad

ping


9 posted on 02/20/2008 4:59:05 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
This sounds like Hitlery's plan to fight terrorism....fully fund our nations first responders.

This should leave those hajiis quaking in their boots.

11 posted on 02/20/2008 5:17:31 PM PST by nitzy (globalism and limited government cannot co-exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The USA should have announced right after 9/11 that in the event of any kind of WMD attack on US citizens, facilities, and/or allied interests ALL state and transnational sponsors of terrorism may (at our discretion) be subject to any and all kinds of retaliation, i.e., in the uncertain and murky world we will not require definitive proof before taking out any and every govt. that supports terrorists. We should have every Islamo-scumbag government quaking in their slippers, and instead the excrement of Tehran and Damascus, et al still plays games with us.....

THAT would have been a “Bush Doctrine” worthy of respect.

Such a policy would give ever Islamo-scum govt. reason to block other groups and PREVENT major terrorist attacks on the west, since they would have to fear that any jihad morons could bring a massive retaliation upon everyone’s heads.


16 posted on 02/20/2008 5:37:00 PM PST by Enchante (Democrats: we'll send Pelosi and Brezinski to Damascus, that's our foreign policy!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Congress has done everything in its power to prevent us from protecting ouselves. These traitors have blood on thier hands if God forbid there is another attack!


17 posted on 02/20/2008 5:39:11 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Id rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This is an interesting article because it displays the mind set of a group of influential persons. In their world, one would determine the guilty persons, then determine a proportional response, and execute it (with all appropriate legal “i”s dotted and “t”s crossed). To use a poor analogy, if a wolf ate attacked and killed your child, you would use all available technology to determine the guilty wolf, track in down, and shoot it. All of your actions would be done legally of course. This would include getting the proper licenses permission to enter private or government lands etc.

Another approach is to clearly tell all Heads of State, Dictators, Kings, and other leaders of nations of various types, an extremely simple message. If a group harbored in their nation launches a nuclear strike at the United States, we will retaliate with nuclear weapons. Strike targets will include their major cities and religious sites. I believe that the latter approach would be the most effective in preventing any attack.


18 posted on 02/20/2008 5:46:15 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Discovering that a terrorist explosive was made of uranium stolen from a specific site in Russia, for example, does not identify the terrorists, but it does provide a starting point, especially if there is suspicion that the bomb makers had inside help.

Interesting hypothetical. We suspect that the nuclear material within the nuclear device that just destroyed Manhattan, was stolen from Russia with inside help. That provides us with a STARTING POINT ? A starting point to where ? Do they seriously suspect the Russians will cooperate with the investigation ? Just look at how they cooperated with the investigation into the radiation poisoning of their dissident. Nothing will happen. Our politicians wont even be able to figure out who to retaliate against. And even if they do figure out who to retaliate against there will be intense inside pressure to not retaliate at all since so many Politicians in DC are on the payroll of some foreign government. At any rate, if the Russians want to pay us back for Kosovo, they will simply assist some terrorist organization with getting a domestically produced nuclear device from a third party cutout (ex-Iran). So how do you say checkmate in Russian ?

19 posted on 02/20/2008 5:55:11 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
What is wrong with the country we live in? This should be a very important question, yet it is not discussed. It is important because the right discussion and preconditions could afford deterrent.

However, Roger Clemmons on steroids is deemed more newsworthy.

20 posted on 02/20/2008 5:55:32 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Doesn’t matter. Even if a group claimed it.

The lunatic left drive by media would blame Bush anyway. Look at 9-11 and Katrina!

Remote control flying airplanes into the WTC and they actually deny a plane even hit the pentagon, they assert a rocket from an F-15 did that to the pentagon.

Cheney has a secret raygun under the Gulf of Mexico on a sub to create evil weather to wipe out poor people.

And in the remote chance they did accept it, it would be America’s fault and we deserved it anyway.


21 posted on 02/20/2008 6:02:08 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
This report is a classic example of narrowly focused academics not being able to see what is right in front of them.

In the late 1980's and early 1990's a team of geniuses I supervised developed a program to identify in advance where crimes were likely to occur and, by inputting information into a relational database, identify the perpetrator with a probability in the high 70% range. Since I retired, I have not kept track of what has been accomplished since, but I KNOW we have the means. These academics are just that; academics. Operations types are the ones who know best what will work and what won't If you put them in charge, things get done.

25 posted on 02/20/2008 6:28:54 PM PST by oneolcop (Take off the gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson