Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madison10

You’re the one that’s nuts if you think the Clintons are weaker than a political novice. He may be flying high NOW, but it’s a long way to November-and there are a lot of people who won’t vote for a black-regardless of what they tell polsters. But there are a TON of women who would vote for the Clintons. Do the math. Blacks-13% of population. Women-51% of population. Add to the women the spanish (including illegals), the meterosexual males, the men (and women) who want to give Bill a third term,voting fraud, etc; and you’re asking for disaster. And that ‘go to DU because you don’t think like me’ is getting old and childish. There should be room for disagreement here without getting insulting about it. A lot of you have forgotten the 90s, apparently. I, for one, am still filled with a burning unbridled hatred for these two slimy ba$tards, and I want them to have the least chance possible to soil the White House again. Because if they get back, we’re going to have them for eight more years. I personally couldn’t take it-my blood pressure alone would kill me.


30 posted on 02/20/2008 11:36:34 AM PST by The Ghost of Rudy McRomney (Ohio & Texas-cross over & vote Obama! LEAVE NO DOUBT! TAKE THEM OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney

I think you underestimate Obama’s cult-like following.


50 posted on 02/20/2008 11:47:50 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney

I wasn’t trying to be insulting...just joking around, except that I do think Hillary is the weaker candidate. She is a better cheater/liar/powermonger, though, so maybe they should take her out now.:)


55 posted on 02/20/2008 11:50:49 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
100% agree on all your points.

First, why put off until tomorrow which could be done today. If the Beast loses the primary it is damn near a stake through the heart of the clinton political machine. End it now and end it for good.

Second, liberals are hypocrites. They will say they will vote for the black candidate but will come up short. The older dem’s are elitist and Obama doesn’t make the cut.

Third, I too am tired of the “go back to DU” bull$hit because of differing opinions. If you don’t have constructive criticism or a rational rebuttal to an opinion then don’t post and pi$$ off.

Fourth, where as I agree if clinton gets elected it is possibly eight years of the both of them I honestly believe (and I am in no way promoting this) that her many enemies will come gunning for her.

72 posted on 02/20/2008 12:01:48 PM PST by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney

Prez HillBillary 2: a truly nauseating prospect.

I wonder which “gamble” would choose:
(1). 75% odds Obama wins, 25% McCain wins
(2). 50% odds Clinton wins, 50% McCain wins

Tweak numbers as you see fit: who would choose (1) for certainy of no Clinton(s)?


76 posted on 02/20/2008 12:03:32 PM PST by MoreGovLess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney

I agree with you. Hillary might indeed be more formidable in the general, b/c she and Bill have been around this track and the pressure on American women to vote for a woman will be intense.

Take her out, now.

Additionally, even if Obama somehow gets elected, he will be totally ineffective, whereas Hillary can transform evil into action.


105 posted on 02/20/2008 1:45:01 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson