Why can’t we be against BOTH of them and take any sides? Clemens maybe a disgraced Warrior, but he still disgraced and his dishonest and Klintonesque lying should be reviled and not supported. JMO.I think Clemens is full of it, but there is no way in hell I'm going to take the word of a rapist drug dealer over him.
If anything, this whole sham of a hearing just should not have happened, but waxman was hell bent on getting some face time and making the drug dealing rapist look good for his buddy Mitchell.
Waxman’s circus with Clemens helped divert attention away from the expiration of the FISA Act. The entire country was watching Roger while the Congress let a valuable tool for fighting terrorism lapse. Now, who deserves a criminal trial more?