Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Republican
Second, Peter does sounds like that he respects President Bush, and his character and seems to be defending his honor.

Gammons is a diehard liberal, this isn't even a question, he is so far left, he is downright socialist.

That said, and I hate politics and sports mixing, but it was only natural for the dems to back the drug dealer since he was the star of the mitchell report, which was authored by the former democratic senate majority leader.

Between the 2, I think both are full of crap, but I'd rather err on the side of the guy who supports "wounded warriors" then side with a guy who was a drug dealing thug.

3 posted on 02/18/2008 9:49:57 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sonny M

Why can’t we be against BOTH of them and take any sides? Clemens maybe a disgraced Warrior, but he still disgraced and his dishonest and Klintonesque lying should be reviled and not supported. JMO.


5 posted on 02/18/2008 9:52:29 AM PST by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson