Skip to comments.
U.S. Considering Shooting Down Satellite
Aviation Week ^
| David A. Fulghum
Posted on 02/13/2008 4:59:37 AM PST by maquiladora
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: Wavrnr10
EXCUSE ME....if the tank is full....fire it and put it back into orbit!!!!! Hard to do, considering they lost contact with this satellite shortly after it was inserted into orbit......
41
posted on
02/13/2008 6:13:05 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
To: maquiladora
the impact could affect humans - perhaps kill some - out to a distance of "20-30 yards,"
...and if it hit somebody in the head it would knock them out cold.
42
posted on
02/13/2008 6:30:28 AM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
( Don’t go messing with Smokey Taylor. He just bought a whole bunch of fresh ammo.)
To: bill1952
"...The last that I heard we no longer had the weapon systems to do this...That's OK, we can just buy the technology back from the Chinese.
43
posted on
02/13/2008 6:39:53 AM PST
by
-=SoylentSquirrel=-
(I'm a Conservative abandoned by his party.)
To: maquiladora
They want to create another satellite debris cloud, similar to the one the Chinese created?
44
posted on
02/13/2008 6:40:51 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: TMSuchman
Launch a space shuttle with a couple of computer techs on board and let them repair the computer(s).
45
posted on
02/13/2008 6:43:49 AM PST
by
Citizen Tom Paine
(Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
To: nnn0jeh
46
posted on
02/13/2008 6:45:43 AM PST
by
kalee
(The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
To: r9etb
Well, it can be simplified then: 1-in-5 lined up against a wall and shot.
47
posted on
02/13/2008 6:47:48 AM PST
by
Justa
(Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
To: battlecry
Not really applicable to the shuttle accident, which was under controlled flight for most of it’s descent. It was no accident that the debris was in Texas, as that was the state the shuttle was attempting to land. It was well into it’s decent when the heat shield failed. In an uncontrolled descent, without heat shielding, those satellite fuel tanks will blow at a much higher altitude.
48
posted on
02/13/2008 6:48:58 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(Happy Leap Month!)
To: r9etb
What we need is a shuttle full of oil rig workers and buggies and stuff. And a puppy! Awwwwwww.
49
posted on
02/13/2008 6:56:25 AM PST
by
Shryke
To: Tennessee_Bob
From "howstuffworks.com"
The airbag's inflation system reacts sodium azide (NaN3) with potassium nitrate (KNO3) to produce nitrogen gas. Hot blasts of the nitrogen inflate the airbag.
The original Chrysler one had hydrazine for sure. There were considered toxic waste after firing.
50
posted on
02/13/2008 7:01:35 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: CholeraJoe
Yeah, but what about the Desert Tortoise? My God, man, have you no compassion?
51
posted on
02/13/2008 7:07:53 AM PST
by
papasmurf
(Calm down! I've got Greenspan's book, you jerk!)
To: Citizen Tom Paine
Launch a space shuttle with a couple of computer techs on board and let them repair the computer(s). They can't get anybody from the Geek Squad to go.
52
posted on
02/13/2008 7:08:27 AM PST
by
scooter2
(The greatest threat to the security of the United States is the Democratic Party.)
To: cripplecreek
Considering the fact that so much of our stuff is made in China its hard to say what is and isnt secret anymore.Shhhh, that's a secret.
53
posted on
02/13/2008 7:25:52 AM PST
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: DGHoodini
” It was no accident that the debris was in Texas, as that was the state the shuttle was attempting to land.”
Exactly where in Texas was the Shuttle supposed to land? DFW or HOU.
The Columbia was on course to land at the Cape, not in Texas.
54
posted on
02/13/2008 8:39:07 AM PST
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: Wavrnr10
Apparently something isn’t quite right or I’m sure they would have thought of that. If it is fireable though, why not just run it out of fuel. Lack of control must be an issue or they would have done that as well.
55
posted on
02/13/2008 8:53:19 AM PST
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: Justa
>> Well, it can be simplified then: 1-in-5 lined up against a wall and shot. <<
Yeah, I think Julius Caesar called it “quintimation.”
56
posted on
02/13/2008 9:26:42 AM PST
by
Hawthorn
To: Condor51
Nope.
Set all Beebers to ‘stune’!
57
posted on
02/13/2008 9:32:55 AM PST
by
NonLinear
("They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge." -Thomas B Reed)
To: chaosagent; DGHoodini; battlecry
Re:
It was no accident that the debris was in Texas, as that was the state the shuttle was attempting to land.
Exactly where in Texas was the Shuttle supposed to land? DFW or HOU.
The Columbia was on course to land at the Cape, not in Texas. To get down from the shuttle's orbit to the Cape... the flight plan was over Texas. Back to Orbital Mechanics 101 for you!
58
posted on
02/13/2008 9:35:34 AM PST
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: chaosagent
My mistake, but still and all, it was on a controlled descent for most of it’s re-entry. and it’s major malfunction was with a damaged heat shielding...shielding that this satellite does not have, as it was never meant to survive re-entry in it’s entirety, in it’s design. Controlled re-entry or not.
59
posted on
02/13/2008 9:41:13 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(Happy Leap Month!)
To: papasmurf
I’ll bet Desert Tortoises make good soup.
60
posted on
02/13/2008 9:55:06 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(Maybe tonight he'll be gone.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson