Kim Hult wrote. “Kirlin does not allege or argue ... that this evidence could not have been discovered before with the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
So, if I lie and you don’t catch me at the beginning, my lie has to stand as the truth?
Congratulations! You now understand the logic of the democrat party faithful.
23 posted on 03/30/2008 11:23:29 AM MDT by Islander7
Having the legal power to effect a result is not a legal imperative to do so.
Assuming that McLean can state a successful claim for adverse possession, you just don’t do that to you neighbor, even an absentee neighbor.
One would think that a respected judge, who has witnessed the sad pagentry of litigation play out in his courtroom for years, would understand this, and would understand why people are upset.
It’s not about legal rights. It’s about doing what is right.
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2007/nov/25/paths-never-crossed-families-in-land-battle-both/