Posted on 02/06/2008 8:45:03 AM PST by westmichman
‘Republicans for Choice’ Endorses McCain By Penny Starr CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer February 06, 2008
(CNSNews.com) - The Republicans for Choice Political Action Committee has endorsed John McCain (R-Ariz.), saying he is the best candidate now that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is out of the presidential race.
The Republicans for Choice PAC supports Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, and also wants the Human Life Amendment removed from the plank of the Republican Party.
Republicans for Choice founder and Chairwoman Ann E.W. Stone told Cybercast News Service that McCain's pro-life position wasn't an issue.
"(McCain) is (pro-life), but it's not at the top of his agenda, not like Huckabee or the born-again Romney," Stone said. "He's shown his willingness to reach across the party, and we look forward to those discussions."
Another Republican pro-abortion group, however, has not endorsed McCain or any other Republican presidential candidate.
"We only endorse pro-choice Republicans," Jennifer Stockman, co-chairwoman of the Republican Majority for Choice, told Cybercast News Service, adding that her organization felt it was too soon to endorse Rudy Giuliani, who left the race after placing a distant third behind McCain and Mitt Romney in the Florida primary.
Stockman said that in a campaign where candidates are vying for the title of "true conservative," nods by pro-abortion groups might not even be welcomed.
"Our endorsement, quite frankly, wouldn't help anyone in the primary," Stockman said.
Colleen Parro, executive director of the Republican National Coalition for Life, said the endorsement should make some Republicans uncomfortable.
"My first thought was how embarrassing for the pro-lifers who have signed on for McCain," Parro said.
Another pro-life group, Democrats for Life of America, said they can't find a candidate to endorse.
"None of the candidates fit our criteria," Kristen Day, executive director of DFLA, told Cybercast News Service. "If we were to endorse Obama or Clinton, it would ruin our credibility.
"We are focused on the pro-life Democrats who are running for Congress, the U.S. Senate and in local races across the country."
The DLFA did not endorse Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) in the 2004 election.
Here’s one for the McCaniacs.
Republicans for Choice... kinda like Jews for Jesus.
GOP delenda est.
I’ve met some “Jews for Jesus”. No different than “Dutchmen for Jesus”.
This ought to make him even better for the Huck supporters.
John is pro-life; just not at the top of his list; so what? The important element is judgeships, and I’d rather have him than Hillary or Obama choosing them.
That picture and your comment pretty much sums up my feelings also.
That’s GREAT.
Thanks, WMM
Vote for Hillary, and you can have a picture of a dead country, literally.
And the Log Packin'...err...Cabin Republicans.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965863/posts
Sorry for the repost then. I should have checked first.
Yep! We’ll have two liberal parties now. The media can be happy and focus entirely on the horse race aspects, race, gender, and other such matters in all future campaigns, without having to worry that a conservative might win.
Mr. niteowl77
Shouldn’t that say “Republicans in Name Only” Endorse John McCain?
Great visual.
“Vote for Hillary, and you can have a picture of a dead country, literally.”
The drumbeat starts......if you don’t vote for McCain, we’re gonna get Hillary. Not working this time.
Shouldn’t that say “Republicans in Name Only” Endorse John McCain?
That is implied I believe,
reading
between the lines.
Hopefully this is the last time I ask this as I hate beating a dead horse, but HOW, HOW, HOW did this man get all these votes from Republicans and most likely a nomination? I feel as though I have been living on Mars for the last four years or in a dream land. I had no idea the liberals had completely overtaken our party--I knew there were specific areas for sure and with no doubt, but the whole banana? Wow.
That graphic is hilarious. I’m going to steal that ...
RINOs endorsing a RINO. Big deal!
Oh, right, Dems don't allow dissent.
I am sick of hearing judgeships....so we might have 2 or 3 more conservatives judges from pool to draw for supreme court....chances are when we get another conservative in the white house, he wont have any good judges too choose. I think we need work more on reigning in the SC than anything. we cant place our bets on our guy getting us a conservative judge in the sc
Not really. One chooses death. The other chooses life.
“Not really. One chooses death. The other chooses life.”
I was speaking of the inherent contradictions of the positions. But I get what you’re saying.
What makes you think he wouldn’t each across the aisle for approval from is good friends regarding judges? He has no history of either appointing or nominating judges. He voted for some but that means nothing.
What makes you think he wouldn’t reach across the aisle for approval from is good friends regarding judges? He has no history of either appointing or nominating judges. He voted for some but that means nothing.
A group like this doesn’t endorse unless they see promise in a candidate (maybe even have received assurances from a candidate).
that bears repeating :p
I just don’t think people can be scared into voting for someone who is unfit to serve. Not anymore.
That’s for sure. We fell for it in the past and look where it’s gotten us.
I heard LImbaugh asking a caller to name the head of the RNC. She couldn't. The Rush said either could he. That says a lot about the party overall.
And I get what you’re saying, now:)
“The important element is judgeships, and I’d rather have him than Hillary or Obama choosing them.”
Not me. McCain would try to fool his own party by claiming his judges are constructionist, while we end up with a Souter or Darth Vader Ginsburg.
At least when Hillary or Obama choose judges, they’ll know they’re in for a hella fight.
Like the fight the Senate gave Bill when he nominated Ginsburg?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.