Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conspiracy of What?The plot to elect McCain.
Weekly Standard ^ | 02/05/2008 | by Noemie Emery

Posted on 02/05/2008 6:26:15 AM PST by TinaJeannes

THERE IS A LEFT-WING conspiracy at loose in the world, dedicated to undoing conservative governance, only the people who see it aren't sure what it is. John McCain is in it, of course, in fact he is the cause of it, as making him president is the ultimate goal. He is blamed for running, (and perhaps, for breathing), but beyond him the face of the threat is less clear. In fact, the faces are those of other conservative stalwarts, who were their heroes and brethren until--until, say, just after the Florida primary, when McCain emerged as a serious threat. These include Mike Huckabee, the once well-thought of former Arkansas governor (and hero of the social conservative part of the movement), who unaccountably refuses to withdraw from the race on their orders; Tom Coburn and Sam Brownback, perhaps the most conservative members of the United States Senate; Jack Kemp, the supply-side Reagan enthusiast; Phil Gramm, the most conservative Republican to run in the 1996 contest; and Ted Olson, the hero of the Federalist Society, who argued and won the case of Bush vs. Gore. (They may also include the late President Reagan's widow, who, according to the Drudge Report, hearts John McCain.)

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; gopcoup; illegals; immigrantlist; mccain; noemieemery; politics; scamnesty; shamnesty; soros; supertuesday; weeklystandard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: dinoparty

“you all think that lack of conservative purity equals liberal”

Are you kidding me? Have you looked at McCain for the last 8 years? Your desire to just be on the winning team is what’s irrational.


21 posted on 02/05/2008 6:49:51 AM PST by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
I didn't understand the article either. He spent 1000 words saying absolutely nothing.

The only coherent point I was able to pick up was that the voters picked John McCain, so shut up and like it.

22 posted on 02/05/2008 6:50:18 AM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Defeat you.

LOL! Good answer!

Though I don't think going third party is the right idea...I like how you responded.

23 posted on 02/05/2008 6:50:58 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
“Defeat you.”

Mohammad Saeed al-Sahhaf, is that you? Welcome to FR.

24 posted on 02/05/2008 6:51:04 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

This article completely misses the substance of why people are concerned about McCain. I fear that McCain would make a bad president. He opposed the Bush tax cuts and supported legislation that would require a supermajority in congress and the senate to reduce taxes. McCain-Kennedy was terrible legilation that would destroy our country in the future. He favors huge government subsidies for illegal aliens. He favors taxes to combat global warming that would add at least $.50-$1.00 to a gallon of gas and also tax electricity, etc. McCain would not allow the interrogation of terrorists. McCain has shown himself to be corrupt(Keating 5). McCain attacks business and private enterprise. McCain as president would let Democrats like Ted Kennedy control the agenda. People who are aware and concerned about these things are now being told to shut up.


25 posted on 02/05/2008 6:51:11 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

“That is a recipe for permanent irrelevance.”

Not exactly. The Republican Party started out as a third party. The Progressive Party wound up influencing both the Republicans and the Democrats. Even the Socialists wound up influencing the New Deal.


26 posted on 02/05/2008 6:51:19 AM PST by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

If McCain takes the nomination, there will be absolutely no better time to go third party. That may guarantee th Dims a win, but it will give whiplash to the bigheads in the Republican Party that think they can dump the conservatives and pander to the muddled middle vote.

We fought amnesty; now, we fight the authors of amnesty.


27 posted on 02/05/2008 6:52:08 AM PST by claudiustg (Sic Semper Tyrannus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

-—And with your 15% of the former Republican party vote, what will you do?

Defeat you.-—

Damn right! Well said!


28 posted on 02/05/2008 6:53:39 AM PST by claudiustg (Sic Semper Tyrannus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

In November, I will be voting for “McLame”, aka “McNasty”, aka “McManiac.”

But not today.


29 posted on 02/05/2008 6:53:39 AM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
Welcome to FR.

I didn't ask you...

30 posted on 02/05/2008 6:53:42 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

My personal fave is Juan McAmnesty.


31 posted on 02/05/2008 6:54:22 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Mitt's Profits Financed John's Patriotism.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m voting for Romney today. I would rather he be the nominee. But I think its stupid and irresponsible to say that you won’t vote for McCain if he is the nominee.


32 posted on 02/05/2008 6:54:55 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

Isn’t the Weekly Standard the house organ for the Teddy Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party?


33 posted on 02/05/2008 6:55:02 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

“Actually, they have not done a thing beyond endorsing a four-term Republican senator with a lifetime 82 percent ACU rating”

What I would like to know is what is his ACU rating since 2000? I think McCain was a good conservative up until the South Carolina primary of 2000. Since then he has been on a mission to stick it to conservatives and George Bush. Perhaps a lot of these conservative stalwarts remember the John McCain of pre-2000. Since then has come all of his ridiculous positions such as McCain/Feingold.


34 posted on 02/05/2008 6:55:14 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

35 posted on 02/05/2008 6:55:38 AM PST by Gritty (The thought of McCain being President sends a cold chill down my spine - Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL

Me too.


36 posted on 02/05/2008 6:57:39 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

There are lots of people who have links to Soros. He covers all bases and he has the money to do it. He is nothing but a hungarian commmie loving nut case. and btw dont take offense. MY grt grandmother was hungarian also.


37 posted on 02/05/2008 6:58:00 AM PST by TinaJeannes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden; TinaJeannes

You’re right McCain’s taken a leftward turn for awhile now.

From americanthinker.com.....

“First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006.”


38 posted on 02/05/2008 6:59:43 AM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

It’s not about “conservative purity.” It’s about the future of our country.


39 posted on 02/05/2008 6:59:53 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

If conservatives were polled and asked who they want as President none of those still running under the GOP ticket would make the top 10. This is another piece that misses the point. Conservatives want a conservative as President. What is so difficult to understand about that?


40 posted on 02/05/2008 7:00:27 AM PST by free_life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson