[Balding_Eagle]

All that is fine in theory, and perhaps in a courtroom.

However, we do know what lead to this, and along the way she put her baby at extreme risk.

If that action alone doesn’t deserve death, please tell me what will deserve the death penalty.

In the process of nearly killing her baby, she slipped into this coma.

Many people would prefer to see her starve to death for her actions against the baby alone. Include me in that group.

They need a different case to advance what is otherwise a noble cause. This case, defending a would-be killer, just sullies and discredits everyone involved.

[wagglebee]

However, we do know what lead to this, and along the way she put her baby at extreme risk.

If that action alone doesn’t deserve death, please tell me what will deserve the death penalty.

You seem to overlook the fact that Lauren's baby DID NOT die.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

If that action alone doesn’t deserve death, please tell me what will deserve the death penalty. In the process of nearly killing her baby, she slipped into this coma. Many people would prefer to see her starve to death for her actions against the baby alone. Include me in that group.

You have revealed that your motivation on this thread hasn't been about making the correct moral decision in this case but rather about executing a mother you deem to be unfit. You just advocated murder on a public forum. You are clearly a sociopath if not a psychopath and I hope you seek help. Do not post to me again.

[TigersEye]

If that action alone doesn’t deserve death, please tell me what will deserve the death penalty.

Starving the helpless might qualify. lol