[wideawake]

Even if this year's version of Paul's domestic agenda sounded wonderful - and it doesn't - his defeatist attitude toward the US war effort still rules him out.

And that's just policy.

In terms of practical ability to govern, he has demonstrated in Congress a complete inability to lead and to assemble consenus on any important legislation.

His inability to even run his own newsletter demonstrates that he has zero executive ability.

Ron Paul isn't fit to be mayor of a town of one.

[Bruinator]

Granted, but concensus is the absence of leadership. If you are going to lead, then you lead to your point of view.

[papasmurf]

His record in Congress can be described as very similar to some of his supporters.

They spam the internet, he spams Congress. Neither one has garnered any support that will move our Country forward.

300 + bills introduced, less than 5 passed.

What bothers me is, that he collects so much in donations, and can’t get a lift in the polls or the primaries. Moonbats just don’t have that kind of disposable income.

To my way of thinking, this suggests money from sources trying to tilt the playing field, but not able to vote.