aPaulogists sure give us plenty of material to use eh?
The Devil is in the details. Really!
aPaulogists love to use talking points they believe fit an occasion, regardless of how they agree with, or contradict, previous points.
For instance: We beat a dead horse because Paul won’t get the GOP nomination anyway. vs. Paul is out polling and out funding Thompson, Giuliani, etc.
So now we see an obviously political use of the circumstantial birthday of a revered Black American, to refute allegations that Dr. Paul has had highly derogatory remarks made under his masthead about the same individual in the past.. I’m curious what RuePaul’s 2007 (or 2006, or 2005, or...) statement about Dr. King’s birthday contained. After all, since Dr. Paul considers him such a great American, there had to be a similar statement made in 2007 or name the year, hadn’t there?