Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Haddit

These guys are already employed there. It is a change to previously-agreed working conditions.


2 posted on 01/13/2008 1:07:10 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user

Just remember that you’re supporting a ruling from the Ninth Circle-Jerk Court of Appeals for the United States.

IMO, JPL is validly a top level security institution. As such, I believe background checks are justified.

If someone had slipped through before, I would like to have that rectified now, before something bad happened.


5 posted on 01/13/2008 1:17:45 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user
These guys are already employed there. It is a change to previously-agreed working conditions.

So if you catch a spy working, you cannot fire him are put him in jail. I think I will call BS on your statement. Most all sensitive positions in the government that people sign wavers on say that the rules are subject to change.

16 posted on 01/13/2008 1:57:04 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson