Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woes mount for Mexico's state oil titan[Pemex]
Los Angeles Times ^ | January 2, 2008 | Marla Dickerson

Posted on 01/02/2008 4:39:56 PM PST by SwinneySwitch

Output is declining rapidly, but national pride and politics may block possible fixes.

MEXICO CITY -- With crude oil topping $95 a barrel, these should be heady days for Petroleos Mexicanos. Mexico's state-owned oil monopoly, known as Pemex, generated record revenue of about $100 billion in 2007.

But at a ceremony marking the 69th anniversary of the nationalization of Mexico's oil industry last year, Pemex General Director Jesus Reyes Heroles wasn't in a celebratory mood.

"The situation of Petroleos Mexicanos is critical and merits immediate attention," the company's top executive said.

Indeed, 2007 tapped a gusher of concerns for the world's sixth-largest oil producer.

Pemex managed to lose $1.2 billion in the third quarter. Output is declining, as are exports and proven reserves. Mexican Energy Secretary Georgina Kessel said last month that Mexico's crude production, which averaged about 3.1 million barrels a day in 2007, could fall as much as one-third in less than a decade if the nation didn't move fast to reverse the slide.

The consequences could be painful, not only for Mexico, which relies on oil revenue to fund about 40% of its federal spending, but also for world markets, which are feeling the pinch of tight supplies. Mexico is the No. 2 provider of petroleum to the United States, behind Canada.

The bad news isn't confined to the financial pages. An emblem of national pride and the nation's most important company, Pemex lurched from one humiliating episode to another in 2007. Among them:

* Leftist guerrillas pulled off a series of pipeline bombings that sent the government scrambling to deploy troops to protect company installations.

* An accident at an offshore oil platform killed 22 workers in October and crippled a major well. Public outcry forced Pemex to take the unprecedented step of appointing an independent...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: corruption; energy; oil; pemex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Mexicans remain fiercely proud that their country wrested its petroleum assets from foreign companies such as Standard Oil decades ago and committed them to social development.

"Mexico stood up to the United States and won," Enrique Bravo, Latin America analyst for consulting firm Eurasia Group in Washington, wrote in a recent report. "Pemex is thus much more than an oil company; it is a powerful symbol of Mexican national sovereignty."

1 posted on 01/02/2008 4:39:57 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

give us 30% and we’ll fix it...


2 posted on 01/02/2008 4:42:08 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Mexico nationalized their oil industry and then sided with the Axis. Good move.


3 posted on 01/02/2008 4:43:13 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Oh yeah? If PEMEX is so great, how come more than 30% of the Mexican labor force is illegally in the U.S. sending gringo dollars back to support the great economic engine that provides for all the peasants, huh Mexico? The silence is deafening.....


4 posted on 01/02/2008 4:44:42 PM PST by john drake (Roman military maxim; "oderint dum metuant," i.e., "let them hate, as long as they fear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Socialists think its some kind of black magic when state oil companies and oil producing governments, who own their own oil, are bankrupt, and private oil companies who mostly (outside the US) do not are making money hand over fist. In their eyes it looks like some kind of huge criminal sleight of hand.


5 posted on 01/02/2008 4:45:53 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Yes, but will it buy me a week in Ixtapa ?


6 posted on 01/02/2008 4:47:57 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Looks like that national oil thing in Mexico is working every bit as well as that national health care thing in Canada is working. From those with the means to those with the need. Yea!


7 posted on 01/02/2008 4:55:38 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Socialist see someone with pie and want to take it to give to whomever they deem deserving until there is no more pie.

Capitalist make more pie.


8 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:02 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

These idiotas can’t even pump oil properly to maximize output from a given field. They are probably getting 50% from a field that can yield 90% of what is down there


9 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:18 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Proof, again, that nothing fails so miserably as government - anywhere.


10 posted on 01/02/2008 5:00:01 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
The consequences could be painful, not only for Mexico, which relies on oil revenue to fund about 40% of its federal spending, but also for world markets, which are feeling the pinch of tight supplies. Mexico is the No. 2 provider of petroleum to the United States, behind Canada.

If this kicks in, it will mean higher prices for us. - tom

11 posted on 01/02/2008 5:05:23 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john drake

Mexico spent its oil-company revenue on “social welfare,” the politically correct way of saying “political corruption.” Just like our Congress spends our money. Just wait until they control our oil companies in 2009.


12 posted on 01/02/2008 5:05:26 PM PST by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

You have to love nationalized oil companies. When Nigeria nationalized theirs, they passed a law saying all the rigs had to be run by Nigerian crews.

All the brits and yanks left. One after another they started losing rigs and crews. They then amended the law to say that 80% of the crew had to be Nigerian. That meant that the 20% that knew had to run the rig could be foreign, i.e. qualified, to run the rigs.

So the Mexicans are having problems with increasing proven reserves. Why am I not surprised?


13 posted on 01/02/2008 5:16:52 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

I just got back from Mexico. Pemex seriously sucks.

There are no other stations in the rathole I visited (Cozumel). Pemex is a turd world monopoly and totally non-consumer oriented. No one else can sell gas: no Shell, No Exxon, etc. A 25 minute wait behind a line of gasping-for-air pollution wrecks. Rip off exchange rates. Every telephone pole at Pemex and elsewhere in the feces-smelling town is plastered with giant pictures of the PRI socialist crooks who run this hell-hole.


14 posted on 01/02/2008 5:31:05 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

If you think Cozumel is a rathole, try going on the mainland about 1 hour in. Cozumel is a tourist trap and, as such, is actually quite high end and elegant by Mexican standards.


15 posted on 01/02/2008 5:43:56 PM PST by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Americans are being forced by their own government to accept the invasion that has taken place the last eight years by illgal immigrants from all over South America and I have asked myself countless times why George Bush is not controlling the border. Everything I have seen out of the White House about stopping the invasion has been nothing but smoke and mirrors. I am being very nice, I am convinced someone is on the take from these criminals in South America, Oil and Drugs. The Americans are getting sold down the river more and more each day, Jobs are being denied Americans because cheap labor is abundant from the banana republic of Mexico. What is very sad about the whole thing is; the real Americans don’t have a soul in politics to stop the invasion, it is just getting worse each day.


16 posted on 01/02/2008 5:53:38 PM PST by Mojohemi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Next time, go to the Baja - trust me.

(but only in B.C.S - the mainland sucks so bad they should change it’s name to “Kirby”)


17 posted on 01/02/2008 5:55:08 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
Pemex is much more than an oil company...<.i>

It is producing a lot less money for all that social spending than it would if it were still run by the hated Norteamericanos and taxed. It would be discovering and exploiting more oilfields that are out in the Gulf as well as off the west coast.

18 posted on 01/02/2008 5:56:09 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew

I go to Cozumel 2 or 3 times a year to scuba dive. It’s a trap alright, but only if you fall into it. Heck, I know places you can eat a big meal for about 3 USD. But that’s just me. I really only go there for the diving.


19 posted on 01/02/2008 5:59:34 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Devoting PEMEX’s funds to “social development” really means lining the pockets of the corrupt elite.


20 posted on 01/02/2008 6:15:12 PM PST by bajabaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson