Skip to comments.
Hawkins seeks ban on payday lenders
Spartanburg Herald-Journal ^
| Sunday, December 30, 2007
| Robert W. Dalton
Posted on 12/30/2007 2:36:27 PM PST by VRWCtaz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
To: VRWCtaz
"Industry critics say the annualized interest rate, nearly 400 percent, is too high a price to pay, and that too many people get trapped in a cycle of borrowing more to pay off previous loans."
So it's the governments job to prevent people from being complete morons? It's been a few years since I was poor, but I don't remember being this stupid. Why don't people open a checking account?
61
posted on
12/30/2007 4:46:29 PM PST
by
boop
(Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
To: VRWCtaz
“I don’t see that. As long as they have full disclosure and adhere to all regulations, it’s no more of a “scummy” operation than say, a state run lottery.”
At least in a payday loan you get something. With state lottery’s the average person gets nothing except an empty wallet.
To: Bon mots
Don’t get me started on the things financial institutions do to maximize fees. I once had a situation involving two separate accounts at the same institution and an EFT (electronic funds transfer) that resulted in two service charges. After several phone calls and a face to face in the branch manager’s office my account was credited back with the fees.
63
posted on
12/30/2007 4:51:13 PM PST
by
VRWCtaz
(You're not just seeing things if you can get others to see them too. Now about the voices...)
To: Alberta's Child
so far every post has it wrong based on assumptions and people’s habits............but I ain’t gonna enlighten anyone,I’m gonna watch 2 ball games
typical assumptions by great freepers but w/o the facts
64
posted on
12/30/2007 5:03:48 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills namedo us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
I do not see that payday loans or credit cards are any different than loan sharks minus the physical intimation. Should we regulate them? Are we our brothers keeper? I see them as predatory and I would mind seeing them out of business. The stores are an eye sore to any community.But there's a market for them... In a solid, middle class neighborhood of Overland Park, KS (near 75th & Metcalf) there are 4 different payday loan offices within 4 blocks of each other. This is a fairly high-rent area. If there wasn't business for them, they wouldn't be there.
Mark
65
posted on
12/30/2007 5:52:09 PM PST
by
MarkL
To: VRWCtaz
“Industry critics say the annualized interest rate, nearly 400 percent, is too high a price to pay, and that too many people get trapped in a cycle of borrowing more to pay off previous loans.”
Industry critics are free to band together, form their own company, and offer the same service for less — if they can.
To: AlaskaErik
The best thing the military can do is educate the troops on these dirtbags.Don't worry. The "dirtbags" aren't able to service people in the military any more.
They'll have to go to "loan sharks" for advances, if they can't find any other way.
Mark
67
posted on
12/30/2007 5:54:09 PM PST
by
MarkL
To: VRWCtaz
I just saw an ad on TV for auto insurance that said they would accept a postdated check if "things are a little tight" right now. That just seems wrong to me. Well, maybe. There are some companies -- many banks, for example -- that routinely waive one required monthly payment (though interest charges still accumulate) around Christmas time.
68
posted on
12/30/2007 5:58:38 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: VRWCtaz
I don't see that. As long as they have full disclosure and adhere to all regulations, it's no more of a "scummy" operation than say, a state run lottery.Regarding full disclosure, I've seen the contracts that people sign from 2 payday load companies: In both cases, both the APR and the total amount that must be payed back (which is also the amount for which you write the check) are in HUGE type. There's NO WAY that you could possibly say that "it was in the fine print." That and the fact that you're getting $300 in cash in return for a check that you just wrote for $345!
Anybody who can't understand that has no business living on their own.
Mark
69
posted on
12/30/2007 5:59:58 PM PST
by
MarkL
To: VRWCtaz; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; Abbeville Conservative; ...
70
posted on
12/30/2007 6:00:42 PM PST
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
To: zebra 2
Walk into most any convience store when its busy and chances are youll wait in line behind obviously poor customers buying scratch-off. It beats me how politicians can fawn over such state-sponsored abuse of the poor while criticising others for joining the party.I like to call the lottery "The Stupid Tax."
Of course, that doesn't keep me from using it as my retirement plan. I invest $5.00 a week towards my retirement in the Powerball!
Mark
71
posted on
12/30/2007 6:04:57 PM PST
by
MarkL
To: dfwgator
Cousin Guido’s “Saving and Loan” business has been cut in half by these brick and mortar establishments that actually pay rent and taxes on their businesses...but then again so have the number of broken arms and fingers at the county hospital...I wonder if there is a correlation between the two?
72
posted on
12/30/2007 6:17:26 PM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: MarkL
It is wrong to prey on peoples desperation, market or not.
To: RetiredArmy
Ive seen the exact same thing happen at every Car dealership in the country too!....the percentage of “upside-down car loans” have increased dramatically!!!...and the poor salesman is asked to sell more and more new cars to the gullible public to keep the scam going!...Its time we outlawed Car Dealerships!!!
74
posted on
12/30/2007 6:27:40 PM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: Pablo64
75
posted on
12/30/2007 6:38:21 PM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
It is wrong to prey on peoples desperation, market or not.Then I suggest you set up your own place, where people in desperate straights can come to you when they need money, but aren't able to get it from banks, or even credit unions.
Or would you just say to those people, "too bad?"
Mark
76
posted on
12/30/2007 6:38:46 PM PST
by
MarkL
To: MarkL
Heaping onto the desperation is not âhelping themâ. The whole reason these places exist is because people over extend themselves and it isnt because of food or basic necessities. It is the problem of instant gratification that drives people into debt. It is sinister to earn a buck off through usury interest fees. As far as giving a “hand up” to someone, when they need help with basic necessities, Yes I do help these people not only through taxes but primarily with private donations.
To: VRWCtaz
Often the big refund is actually the government payout (EIC etc), not a question of them having too much tax withheld.
78
posted on
12/30/2007 6:52:04 PM PST
by
visualops
(artlife.us)
To: SC Swamp Fox
The previous governor candidate (Democrat Tommy Moore) resigned from the state senate in SC after he lost the election and took a high paying lobbyist job with the payday lenders. Dem party chairman Erwin’s marketing company has the payday lenders as one of his biggest customers in SC. But remember all, the Dems are for the little working man out there. So says Edwards and the whole bunch of Dem candidates
79
posted on
12/30/2007 6:59:15 PM PST
by
doosee
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Heaping onto the desperation is not helping them. The whole reason these places exist is because people over extend themselves and it isnt because of food or basic necessities. It is the problem of instant gratification that drives people into debt. It is sinister to earn a buck off through usury interest fees... Let's assume for a moment that you are correct in morally condemning this practice. Should the morally suspect nature of this practice be enough to justify the government in preventing an adult from knowingly and voluntarily entering into such a loan?
80
posted on
12/30/2007 7:11:04 PM PST
by
timm22
(Think critically)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson