[mamelukesabre]

None of that matters. He clearly said he shot the kid by accident.

Why can’t you figure out what that means? If he had felt he was being threatened, he would have fired INTENTIONALLY!

Get it?

[happinesswithoutpeace]

I like looking at precipitating factors. You missed the point of my posts completely. I was referring to rape threats that were allegedly made by the son of the shooter (or his friend) against a young female. This occurred many months prior.

[Mark was here]

None of that matters. He clearly said he shot the kid by accident. Why can’t you figure out what that means? If he had felt he was being threatened, he would have fired INTENTIONALLY! Get it?

Yes, the right to remain silent, it can be handy.