Posted on 12/20/2007 9:07:05 AM PST by Pinkbell
(CNSNews.com) - With Dec. 25 only days away, a central image in the celebration of Christmas - the manger scene featuring replicas of Joseph, Mary and the baby Jesus - has become the focus of attacks by vandals and leaders of "the secular Left," Christian groups charged on Wednesday.
While the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights was erecting a nativity scene in New York City's Central Park, the group issued a news release condemning three dozen instances in which manger scenes were vandalized or stolen from Antioch, Calif., to Leesburg, Va., this Christmas season.
"In perhaps the sickest incident, a public school coach in Marietta, Ga., drove students around the area in his pickup truck, instructing them to thrash Christmas displays after dark," League said.
During their Dec. 8 vandalism spree, 46-year-old John Hayes and several middle school students damaged a number of Christmas displays, let the air out of inflatable figures and rearranged plastic reindeer into X-rated sexual positions.
According to the WGCL TV, Hayes has been charged with trespassing, contributing to the delinquency of minors and reckless conduct.
In addition to physical attacks, nativity scenes are "part of a larger war that the secular Left is waging on all things Christian," said Gary McCaleb, senior counsel with the conservative Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) - which describes itself as "a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation" - in a news release.
During the past week, ADF attorneys have offered to defend free of charge two cities in Wisconsin that faced legal action from the secularist Freedom from Religion Foundation (FRF) if those governments did not remove nativity scenes from their public holiday displays.
In Green Bay, City Council President Chad Fradette - acting as a private citizen - received permission from Mayor Jim Schmitt to place a nativity scene on one of the overhangs at the entrance to City Hall, McCaleb stated.
And officials in Peshtigo allowed private businesses or individuals to place displays for the holiday at Triangle Park, a small municipal park in that city, he said. The holiday display included a nativity scene placed by the Chamber of Commerce, as well as displays of Christmas trees, reindeer, Santa Claus and a rescue squad car.
While affirming that such exhibits are constitutional, McCaleb quoted Annie Laurie Gaylor, FRF co-president, who recently declared in an interview that the state of Wisconsin "cannot have a Christmas anything."
"The American people, common sense and the U.S. Constitution are clearly winning the war on Christmas," McCaleb said in his statement. "These battles against Christmas are out of touch with the 95 percent of Americans" who celebrate the holiday.
"Such attacks are simply part of a larger war that the secular Left is waging on all things Christian," he added.
'Bullying tactic'
But on Wednesday, Rev. Barry Lynn, executive of director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU), said government officials can recognize the holiday season without trampling on the U.S. Constitution.
"Christmas and the Constitution can easily co-exist," Lynn said in a news release. "We are simply urging government officials to follow the law, which bars government from promoting one religious faith over others.
"If officials decide to put up holiday decorations at Christmas, they must do so in a way that does not give government support to Christianity," he said. "America is an incredibly diverse nation, and government should never send the message that one faith is the officially preferred one.
"The federal courts have held that nativity scenes depicting the birth of Jesus may not be displayed on public property in a way that appears to give government approval to Christianity," Lynn noted. "What is so complicated about that?"
In his statement, Lynn said that AU has received complaints from coast to coast regarding displays on government property that are "clearly more suited for a house of worship than city hall."
For example, Macon County, N.C., officials erected a large, illuminated nativity scene on their county courthouse lawn. No other holiday decorations accompany the display.
In a Dec. 6 letter to county commissioners, AU urged that the religious display be removed or that secular items be added. Citing federal court precedent, the group said it is "impermissible to erect a display in which religious elements predominate or that otherwise communicates a message of governmental endorsement of religion."
However, in his Dec. 13 letter to Peshtigo Mayor Tom Strouf, ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley called the demand that the city remove its nativity scene "simply a bullying tactic that is clearly out of step with the law and the facts of this case."
"The Constitution protects private religious speech," Stanley wrote. "It is a fundamental principle of constitutional law that municipalities may not suppress or exclude the speech of private parties simply because the speech is religious or contains a religious perspective.
"The city does not violate the Constitution by treating private religious speech on equal terms with private secular speech," he added.
Also on Wednesday, the owner of a funeral home in Bangor, Pa., told the Easton Express-Times that pieces of a nativity scene stolen from the front porch earlier this month are irreplaceable.
John Fiore has been displaying the nativity scene outside Fiore Funeral Home for 21 years, and now, the baby Jesus and a nesting lamb are missing.
"Where has the Christmas spirit gone that they would stoop so low as to steal the baby Jesus from a nativity scene?" Fiore asked.
Make media inquiries or request an interview with Randy Hall.
Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-brief.
E-mail a comment or news tip to Randy Hall.
Ping!
Liberals show the meaning of tolerance, again.
Well, at least they were trying to be funny...
Time to wield the “hate crime” laws on the books.
Let’s see how well they’re challenged by the ACLU that helped implement them.
This guy has too much time on his hands.
That’s exactly what I said. A liberal posted the beginning of this article on another forum that I post on. He thought it was a riot. I remarked, “Feel the peace, love, and tolerance.”
“In perhaps the sickest incident, a public school coach in Marietta, Ga., drove students around the area in his pickup truck, instructing them to thrash Christmas displays after dark,” League said.
46 year old public school teacher protected by the NEA?
Paid leave at worst..... or maybe a Diversity and Tolerance Badge...
Damned Democrats! Well, I guess if they can burn the American flag and get away with it, then nothing is sacred to them.
I was wondering how Rosie O’Donell was spending her new found free time....
Is this the same Catholic League that was hyperventilating about Huckabee’s recent Christmas ad featuring the image of a cross? So they’re pro-nativity scenes but anti-crosses, right? Got it.
Oh, and do they actually have evidence these vandals are part of the “left wing war on Christmas”? Maybe it’s just some bored kids looking for something to do (most cows are in barns this time of year so you can’t go cow-tipping).
Look, I’m sitting here in front of my Christmas tree now and going to spend most of the day baking Christmas cookies, but I think articles like this make most people roll their eyes and think the Catholic League is just trying to make themselves into martyrs.
The same law that protects displaying Nativity scenes on public land protects people that burn the American flag.
I am Catholic, and I disagreed with them about the cross in the background. I can’t understand how fellow Catholics would be offended by a cross. I thought it was nice that a candidate was willing to mention Jesus Christ at Christmas. I’m not voting for Huckabee, but I had no problem with his commerical.
The kids in Georgia were instructed by a public school coach to destroy nativity scenes.
I don’t think its funny.
Maybe there should be some guards dressed as Templars with drawn swords around the Nativity scenes. Now the results of THAT COULD be “funny”.
Do you know that the “cross” in the background of Huckabee’s ad was really a bookcase? A BOOKCASE! Some religious symbol. Look at that ad again.
Good suggestion!
I would proudly serve jail time for shooting someone who vandalized my nativity scene.
no the huckabee flap is over huckabee lying that it was an accidental image when the obvious lighting and camera tracking is deliberate.
Huckabee needed only say, “yes it is chrismas and we wanted a cross image in the camera shot but we did not want to use an actual cross.”
no debate no problem just honest answer.
This will never be prosecuted as a hate crime. Never. (hate crime laws were created to prosecute White Christian males).
On the night of November 9, 1938, violence against Jews broke out across the Reich. It appeared to be unplanned, set off by Germans' anger over the assassination of a German official in Paris at the hands of a Jewish teenager. In fact, German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazis carefully organized the pogroms. In two days, over 1,000 synagogues were burned, 7,000 Jewish businesses were trashed and looted, dozens of Jewish people were killed, and Jewish cemeteries, hospitals, schools, and homes were looted while police and fire brigades stood by. The pogroms became known as Kristallnacht, the "Night of Broken Glass," for the shattered glass from the store windows that littered the streets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.