Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do You Think It's Fun Being A Denier?
Bob Parks: Outside The Wire ^ | 12/11/07 | Bob Parks

Posted on 12/11/2007 11:36:43 AM PST by bocopar

Who in their right mind would think some of us enjoy being global warming deniers? It’s a perilous position, to be sure.

There are many people whom, just because the weather does things that aren’t always in our creature comfort zone, believe that strange things are happening and it’s all our fault. Whenever a catastrophic tornado or hurricane touches down, it can’t be a natural incident. No, such things aren’t supposed to displace us, or cause undue panic attacks. Life is supposed to be “normal”.

So we have people like Former Vice President Al Gore making movies. We have Hollywood actors, lecturing us on our opulent lifestyles, because they now are experts as they appeared in a movie on the subject. We have politicians scolding us because we dare use common sense when addressing global warming instead of embracing their remedy of the redistribution of wealth in the name of the planet.

(Excerpt) Read more at outsidethewire.mensnewsdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: algore; bobparks; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2007 11:36:43 AM PST by bocopar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bocopar
Who in their right mind would think some of us enjoy being global warming deniers?

Sometimes it makes leftists really angry, which can be entertaining to watch under the right circumstances.
2 posted on 12/11/2007 11:37:48 AM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar

I heard him saying this on Rush. It almost sounded like he was saying “blasphemer”. As a side note, he also sounded slightly effeminate.


3 posted on 12/11/2007 11:41:26 AM PST by stevio ((NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar

What I particularly love are the public announcement shorts aired on television, where actors lecture the public on how to raise their children. It’s one reason why I won’t let a brick in the house. I’d through it through the screen.

As for the ‘green’ issue, these folks are liars. They don’t live green for the most part. In fact they use private jets to travel, fare more wasteful than 99.9% of the public.


4 posted on 12/11/2007 11:41:58 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Your tax dollars at work!!
htHouse Buys Carbon Credits Through Chicago Climate Exchange
CHICAGO, Illinois, November 12, 2007 (ENS) - The Chicago Climate Exchange, which began its greenhouse gas trading operations in 2003, has announced the results of its auction of Carbon Financial Instrument contracts conducted on behalf of the U.S. House of Representatives at its request.

The reverse auction was a bid for 300 contracts representing 30,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent from a pool of U.S. based projects that have offset a proportionate amount of greenhouse gas emissions.

The House purchased these carbon credits to offset the impact of 30,000 tons of carbon emitted by the U.S. Capitol’s coal-burning power plant each year.

The funds will be used on carbon reducing measures, such as planting trees and underground storage of carbon dioxide, as well as green technologies like wind and solar power.

The auction was oversubscribed with a weighted average clearing price of $2.97 per ton, totaling approximately $90,000.

“We are pleased to have the Chicago Climate Exchange provide a price transparency mechanism through this auction service to U. S. House of Representatives as part of its “Greening of the Capitol Initiative,” said Dr. Richard Sandor, chairman and CEO of CCX.

As part of its “Greening of the Capitol Initiative,” the House will retire the tons purchased as one of several strategies to reduce the contribution to greenhouse gas accumulation derived from its operations.

“The U.S. House of Representative’s purchase of CCX Carbon Financial Instrument contracts highlights the contribution to climate change solutions being made by renewable energy providers, farmers, foresters, ranchers, and others, located across the United States, who are also helping build the environmental and financial institutions that can cost-effectively help address environmental concerns for generations to come,” Sandor said.

A financial institution, CCX is the world’s first and North America’s only voluntary, legally binding greenhouse gas emissions reduction, registry and trading system.

The event was held November 5 at the Chicago offices of CCX and attended by Illinois Congressmen Rahm Emanuel, Mark Kirk, and Dan Lipinski, all Democrats, and Dan Beard, the U.S. House of Representatives chief administrative officer, CAO.

“Americans are increasingly concerned about the impact of foreign energy dependence on our national security and the effects of global climate change on the planet,” said Lipinski. “This is an important step in our quest to make Congress carbon neutral and I am extremely proud to be standing here, in Chicago, on this historic day.”

“Through the Greening the Capitol initiative, the House of Representatives joins Chicago in a commitment to energy efficiency and responsible stewardship of the environment,” said Emanuel.

The House will become carbon neutral by purchasing wind power for the electricity it uses, and by substituting natural gas for coal to generate the House’s portion of the electricity produced by the Capitol Power Plant.

To offset the carbon emitted from burning natural gas, the House will purchase carbon offsets. Funding for the purchase of these offsets is available in the Chief Administrative Officer’s Fiscal Year 2008 budget.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2007. All rights reserved.


5 posted on 12/11/2007 11:42:07 AM PST by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bocopar
Catastrophic storms are only catastrophic because we witness their destruction and we have built things in their way. Without weather monitoring equipment and witnesses we wouldn’t know of the incidences of storms. Who can say, with certainty, that before mankind, hundreds of hurricanes and tornadoes didn’t ravage the continent simultaneously?

Our point of refernce is so microscopically small that to have chicken little enviroweenies and their grant-seeking "scientists" running about in hysteria is just the height of arrogance.

6 posted on 12/11/2007 11:47:03 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar

I thoroughly enjoy being a rational denier of a man made global warming. Having seen some of the scientists and the models used to create the IPCC report back in 1999 during a college lecture, I’ve been openly derisive of any and every useful idiot and also the grant swindling academic whores who have latched on to this scam and build climate models that have no basis in reality.


7 posted on 12/11/2007 11:48:11 AM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar
Do You Think It's Fun Being A Denier?

No?

8 posted on 12/11/2007 11:49:36 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar
So how much is a Global Warming denier worth?

These little guys are worth a lot more than OwlGore and his ilk.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

9 posted on 12/11/2007 11:49:57 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar
Basic References:

Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):

Other References:




Antarctic Temperature Trend 1982-2004:



This map (left) shows key areas of Antarctica, including the vast East Antarctic ice sheet. The image on the right shows which areas of the continent's ice are thickening (coloured yellow and red) and thinning (coloured blue). © (Left)British Antarctic Survey, (Right)Science

From the European Space Agency: ERS altimeter survey shows growth of Greenland Ice Sheet interior:

Greenland ice-sheet elevation change in cm/year (see colour scale) derived from 11 years of ERS-1/ERS-2 satellite altimeter data, 1992-2003, excluding some ice-sheet marginal areas (white). +5.4 cm/year, or ~5 cm/year when corrected for bedrock uplift.




10 posted on 12/11/2007 11:50:02 AM PST by sourcery (If Hillary is the next President, she may also be the last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar
Who in their right mind would think some of us enjoy being global warming deniers? It’s a perilous position, to be sure.

I dunno, it has its moments. :-)

11 posted on 12/11/2007 11:56:00 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Global Warming Heretic -- http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bocopar

I prefer to call the climate change alarmists “Debate Deniers,” since in the face of clear and overwhelming evidence to the contrary and against all reason, they continue to deny that there are many scientists who disagree with them.


12 posted on 12/11/2007 12:00:57 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I for one love watching their heads spin when I bring up facts.

I also enjoy supporting the abolition of welfare unless we make them do manual labor for their benefits and a whole raft of other ideas.


13 posted on 12/11/2007 12:07:51 PM PST by festus (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Here are my denials. As a professor who has published many peer-reviewed articles (although not in science), perhaps I should be burned at the stake on Al Gore’s altar:

- I deny that anyone can predict better than random any complex phenomenon 100 years in the future.
- I deny that replacing clean coal burning plants with wind mills and solar panels can change global climate.
- I deny UN models showing global temperature increases can be limited to 2 degrees Celsius with only a modest (3%) impact on GDP.
- I deny that replacing unleaded gasoline with E85 can change global climate.
- I deny that CO2 is a pollutant.
- I deny that carbon credits and trading schemes can change global climate.

I make the following assertions as a counter to global warming hysteria:

- I assert that many urgent problems will be unresolved due to global warming hysteria.
- I assert that global warming hysteria will lead to a depression if the US succumbs to UN mandates.
- I assert that many individuals will reap windfall profits from global warming hysteria.
- I assert global warming is a cover for world-wide socialism.

14 posted on 12/11/2007 12:23:35 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm
These little guys are worth a lot more than OwlGore and his ilk.

You must mean Deniers-R-US.

15 posted on 12/11/2007 12:26:19 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Hard to top the laughs some of us have here on FR


16 posted on 12/11/2007 1:22:46 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

my friend steve sent this:
Global Warming is nothing if not a lever by which the leftists plan to leverage themselves into absolute power. Granting them unlimited power in order to “protect the proletariat” will not longer fly in the court of public opinion so now they move to plan “B”.....unlimited power to “protect the planet”.


17 posted on 12/11/2007 1:32:45 PM PST by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bocopar; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



18 posted on 12/11/2007 3:53:57 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"As for the ‘green’ issue, these folks are liars. They don’t live green for the most part. In fact they use private jets to travel, fare more wasteful than 99.9% of the public"

I'd wager that Babs Streisand has polluted more in her lifetime than entire towns have.

19 posted on 12/11/2007 4:33:23 PM PST by boop (Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boop

I wouldn’t be surprised.


20 posted on 12/11/2007 6:08:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson