Posted on 12/09/2007 6:39:31 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Chuck Shiflett is a smart guy. I like all his points.
Let’s do it.
And this is going to save us from falling like the Roman Empire, huh? Since there doesn’t seem to be much consensus on what exactly caused the downfall of the Roman Empire, it’s interesting to see these solutions.
Current federal programs such as Social Security, Medicaid, SCHIP and other entitlements
or even federal funding of education or transportation should have never have been allowed constitutionally. As envisioned by our founders, states would compete against each other on tax rates, social programs, etc. If New York wants to provide healthcare for all of its residents, and Virginia doesn't want to cover any of its citizens
then that's fine. Let the free market decide which state will be most successful.
If I am correct, this was how it was under the Articles of Confederation.
In his list, the most important reform is TERM LIMITS. There should be no professional politicians.
I tend to disagree with Pat Buchanan about half of the time, but his new book seems to point toward many of the same things that Shiflet is saying and I am in agreement with both men.
The US is in trouble and Buchanan has nailed a vast majority of the reasons. Where Shiflet seems to fall short with the sampling of solutions he presents is that he doesn’t mention anything about shrinking both the size and influence of the federal government to conform more with the vision of the Founding Fathers. Also, he doesn’t address the horrible tax structure we have, the bloated national debt (albeit shrinking), and the theft and re-direction of taxes collected for specific programs (gas tax and SS come to mind).
For my own $0.02 worth, not only would I like to see term limits imposed on all elected positions, I would also like to see them imposed on federal judges, especially the SCOTUS. At present, we have no way to get rid of SC justices who shouldn’t be on the bench. I propose a term of 10 years with the option to be re-appointed for a second 10 year term. I also propose that Congress be prohibited by law from transferring its regulatory and taxing authority to other agencies that have no accountability to the taxpayers.
Finally, I would like to see Congressional sessions limited to 6 months every other year. This cuts down on a lot of the shenanigans and grandstanding they engage in and requires them to focus on the business of the country. If needed, the president should have the authority to call then into special sessions. And, while I’m at it, I want the Capitol to be occupied for only 1 of those 6 month sessions. Communications technologies today are more than capable of providing all of the services required for the Congress to meet and keep the representatives and senators in their home districts. This way, they have to live in the mess they make, instead of isolating themselves in Washington where they insulate themselves from the people who put them there.
/rant
A good question to those who would love to see it go the way of the Roman Empire would be: do you want to live in the world that is run by China, Russia and Europe fighting over who will grab what?
While I agree with the desired outcome, here is the fatal flaw with term limits: imagine the entire government run the way the State Department is run, that is by an entrenched bureaucracy. The issue with term limits is that the pols who come and go cannot stay long enough to gain an institutional memory. They must rely on the ever-present staff employees, who know that pols will come and go, so they can do almost whatever they please. Term limits only increase the power of the bureaucrats who become even less responsive to citizens because citizens have almost no power over them.
Success caused its downfall.
As envisioned by our founders, states would compete against each other on tax rates, social programs, etc.
At a Fred Thompson meeting I asked why he called himself a federalist. In his answer he talked about the importance of states competing.
You make a good point but, IMO, that’s a simple enough fix - clean house. When the politician goes, so does the herd of barking dogs who supported him (staff) other than the admins who can train his replacement how to turn the computer on and access pending bills.
Without a crew of “Yes men and women” anround to tell the moron how to think, he/she may actually have to write their own speeches.
I know that’s an overly simplistic answer to a complex problem, but the rot at all levels of government has to stop. The best way to stop rot is to replace all the rotten components.
Starting in 2010, 401Ks for politicians and judges. Let the taxpayers do a 6% match and then give ‘em a rollover whenever they leave. Gotta grandfather the current bunch or they won’t vote for it.
Right now they can screw up the country and not have to worry about their retirements - now at the taxpayers’ expense, complete with COLAs. Maybe if their own future was as stake like ours, they’d be a little more careful on how they voted.
You do know the Articles of Confederation were replaced because they were not allowing for an effective Government?
I like his ideas about Campaign finance reform. Term limits often seem to me to be a solution in search of a problem.
Allowing a government with virtually unlimited powers in such a large country without a free press is a formula for despotism because it is impossible to keep track of what the lying thieves in DC are doing unless you are accurately informed.
But since the press is no longer free (in the sense of presenting competing opinions), but almost monolithically leftist, we need an amendment to restore press freedom by licensing journalists and/or fining media outlets for bias in reporting, etc.
read
This is the point. It’s not about WANTING to keep it; it’s that we are definitely starting to LOSE “it” (federalism). We need to go back to states’ rights and to find some compromise re free speech/elections/money. I believe that this triangle may need some sort of Constitutional amendment. I believe the founders, if alive, would be huddled over this one, what with immediate countrywide information spread that we have today.
Someone else said that nothing will happen as long as we have dumbing-down driveby media, and there is a good point to this. But we need to fight for it anyway. Will President Fred Thompson have the cojones to put aside the urgent for the Very Important and try to sit down with the American people and explain it to them? Without a serious leader, nothing will change. Americans need to understand that we are at a crossroads and need to make sure we move in the direction the country was intended, toward freedom, and clean up the money-power-election fiasco which is leading us to oligarchy and feudalism.
Another idea could be a school of journalism that would somehow crank out freedom-loving constitutionalists. In other words, not indoctrinate.
Hmmm... since success caused the fall of Rome, then if we destroy most of America's success, then we won't fall like Rome did! See? The Left really does have America's best interests at heart!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.