Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: This land is your land? - Courts abet Colorado couple in land grab
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^ | Dec. 06, 2007 | Editor

Posted on 12/06/2007 6:07:01 AM PST by Nevadan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2007 6:07:04 AM PST by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nevadan

This is not the only crazy law in Colorado.


2 posted on 12/06/2007 6:30:47 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
The judge is a scum bag as he knew exactly what he was doing. BUT - the law is the law and I believe it's basically the same in all states (time line may differ). Even us city slickers who grew up in Chicago know about it.

Not to hijack the thread but as to 'Red River': I love the movie but its so historically and anachronistically wrong, now that I'm older and wiser I shudder a bit when watching it. (but a lot of Westerns are like that)

3 posted on 12/06/2007 6:37:41 AM PST by Condor51 (Rudy has more baggage than Samsonite. But that's okay, the NYPD carries it. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
In at least two states if you fence a parcel of land and pay taxes for 14 years of so, the land becomes yours. The odd thing about this story is that the owners were paying taxes on it.

If you go down to a local court house and look at the tax maps, particularly ones which have not been updated lately, you can find parcel of land which aren’t recorded on the deeds.

4 posted on 12/06/2007 6:55:32 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
Ah, the roar of .44s in the twilight. If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways.

Indeed! Maybe that's the way to deal with this thieving judge and his scumbag lawyer wife....

5 posted on 12/06/2007 6:55:57 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways.

And why does the editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal think that the Libs are so keen to take away our firearms?

6 posted on 12/06/2007 6:59:43 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Res firma mitescere nescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Yes, and the scenery against which the action is shot is completely inappropriate for the supposed setting of the story.


7 posted on 12/06/2007 7:00:09 AM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

I would think that the Kirlins paying property taxes on that land and the county accepting that payment would be enough under common law to establish interest in and ownership of the land.

A neighbor planting tomatoes and drinking a six pack on the land is not enough to maintain a claim of adverse possession.

The article also mentioned the Kirlins maintained a fence. That’s as good as a no trespassing sign under our common law.


8 posted on 12/06/2007 7:03:45 AM PST by sergeantdave (The majority of Michigan voters are that stupid and the condition is incipient and growing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan

Boulder District Judge Morris Sandstead, who served with McLean, issued the restraining order quite swiftly.

Serendipity, I guess.


9 posted on 12/06/2007 7:06:05 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

the law is not basically the same in most states. the law in California, for example, says that the adversse possessor must pay the property taxes.....that is a significant difference.


10 posted on 12/06/2007 7:11:21 AM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

“Law & Order” is just the name of a TV show. We are under the “rule of man” and whichever one has the money, power and influence rolls over the other guy. And it’s going to get darker.


11 posted on 12/06/2007 7:13:42 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
In Texas, if that judge had done his partying on the neighbor's property at night, the media would be referring to "the late Judge..."
12 posted on 12/06/2007 7:14:28 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

This case was terribly mismanaged. If I were the land owner, things would have been settled outside the courtroom. (big grin)


13 posted on 12/06/2007 7:17:36 AM PST by Loud Mime (The Democrats made people believe that govt. lawyers are victims, whatta country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
Ah, the roar of .44s in the twilight. If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways.

You can sometimes pick the mood of the country out from simple sentences. I think this one is a good example. People out in our country are boiling - over illegal immigration, over the Kelo decision, over the NIE report, etc. etc. etc. Who can say what will happen, but sentences like this might give one a clue.
14 posted on 12/06/2007 7:20:18 AM PST by steel_resolve (If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellbender
** Yes, and the scenery against which the action is shot is completely inappropriate for the supposed setting of the story.**

Considering the filming locations I guess so.

Elgin, Arizona, USA
Nogales, Sonora, Mexico
Samuel Goldwyn/Warner Hollywood Studios
San Pedro River, Arizona, USA
Tucson, Arizona, USA
Whetstone Mountains, Arizona, USA

But John Ford may have been the biggest abuser of 'wrong' locations, he loved Monument Valley maybe a tad much.

15 posted on 12/06/2007 7:22:04 AM PST by Condor51 (Rudy has more baggage than Samsonite. But that's okay, the NYPD carries it. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

Las Vegas editorial on the Kirlins. Good stuff


16 posted on 12/06/2007 7:28:52 AM PST by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
This is not the only crazy law in Colorado.

Adverse possession goes back to English common law, and every state has it in one form are the other.

17 posted on 12/06/2007 7:33:43 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan

Edith Stevens is a former chair of the Boulder County Democrats. She and her husband are quite close with the Judge who allowed the adverse possession; the Judge did not recuse himself from the case despite being close friends with these land thieves.


18 posted on 12/06/2007 7:35:58 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
The article also mentioned the Kirlins maintained a fence. That’s as good as a no trespassing sign under our common law.

Yes and the fence wasn't built on the property line, the judge gave them the property to the fence.

19 posted on 12/06/2007 7:36:18 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I was made aware of it when we bought our property here in Missouri. Fortunately, the adverse possession claim resets when property transfers. IE: If you buy land that has prescriptive easement and immediately challenge that use, you can get it canceled by a court.
20 posted on 12/06/2007 7:38:40 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson