Skip to comments.
EDITORIAL: This land is your land? - Courts abet Colorado couple in land grab
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^
| Dec. 06, 2007
| Editor
Posted on 12/06/2007 6:07:01 AM PST by Nevadan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
12/06/2007 6:07:04 AM PST
by
Nevadan
To: Nevadan
This is not the only crazy law in Colorado.
2
posted on
12/06/2007 6:30:47 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: Nevadan
The judge is a scum bag as he knew exactly what he was doing. BUT - the law is the law and I believe it's basically the same in all states (time line may differ). Even us city slickers who grew up in Chicago know about it.
Not to hijack the thread but as to 'Red River': I love the movie but its so historically and anachronistically wrong, now that I'm older and wiser I shudder a bit when watching it. (but a lot of Westerns are like that)
3
posted on
12/06/2007 6:37:41 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Rudy has more baggage than Samsonite. But that's okay, the NYPD carries it. /s)
To: Nevadan
In at least two states if you fence a parcel of land and pay taxes for 14 years of so, the land becomes yours. The odd thing about this story is that the owners were paying taxes on it.
If you go down to a local court house and look at the tax maps, particularly ones which have not been updated lately, you can find parcel of land which aren’t recorded on the deeds.
4
posted on
12/06/2007 6:55:32 AM PST
by
Citizen Tom Paine
(Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
To: Nevadan
Ah, the roar of .44s in the twilight. If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways.Indeed! Maybe that's the way to deal with this thieving judge and his scumbag lawyer wife....
5
posted on
12/06/2007 6:55:57 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Nevadan
If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways. And why does the editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal think that the Libs are so keen to take away our firearms?
To: Condor51
Yes, and the scenery against which the action is shot is completely inappropriate for the supposed setting of the story.
To: Condor51
I would think that the Kirlins paying property taxes on that land and the county accepting that payment would be enough under common law to establish interest in and ownership of the land.
A neighbor planting tomatoes and drinking a six pack on the land is not enough to maintain a claim of adverse possession.
The article also mentioned the Kirlins maintained a fence. That’s as good as a no trespassing sign under our common law.
8
posted on
12/06/2007 7:03:45 AM PST
by
sergeantdave
(The majority of Michigan voters are that stupid and the condition is incipient and growing.)
To: Nevadan
Boulder District Judge Morris Sandstead, who served with McLean, issued the restraining order quite swiftly.
Serendipity, I guess.
9
posted on
12/06/2007 7:06:05 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Condor51
the law is not basically the same in most states. the law in California, for example, says that the adversse possessor must pay the property taxes.....that is a significant difference.
10
posted on
12/06/2007 7:11:21 AM PST
by
kralcmot
(my tagline died with Terri)
To: sergeantdave
“Law & Order” is just the name of a TV show. We are under the “rule of man” and whichever one has the money, power and influence rolls over the other guy. And it’s going to get darker.
To: Nevadan
In Texas, if that judge had done his partying on the neighbor's property at night, the media would be referring to "the late Judge..."
12
posted on
12/06/2007 7:14:28 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: Rummyfan
This case was terribly mismanaged. If I were the land owner, things would have been settled outside the courtroom. (big grin)
13
posted on
12/06/2007 7:17:36 AM PST
by
Loud Mime
(The Democrats made people believe that govt. lawyers are victims, whatta country!)
To: Nevadan
Ah, the roar of .44s in the twilight. If the courts won't protect our property rights, some just might resort to older ways.
You can sometimes pick the mood of the country out from simple sentences. I think this one is a good example. People out in our country are boiling - over illegal immigration, over the Kelo decision, over the NIE report, etc. etc. etc. Who can say what will happen, but sentences like this might give one a clue.
14
posted on
12/06/2007 7:20:18 AM PST
by
steel_resolve
(If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
To: hellbender
** Yes, and the scenery against which the action is shot is completely inappropriate for the supposed setting of the story.**
Considering the filming locations I guess so.
Elgin, Arizona, USA
Nogales, Sonora, Mexico
Samuel Goldwyn/Warner Hollywood Studios
San Pedro River, Arizona, USA
Tucson, Arizona, USA
Whetstone Mountains, Arizona, USA
But John Ford may have been the biggest abuser of 'wrong' locations, he loved Monument Valley maybe a tad much.
15
posted on
12/06/2007 7:22:04 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Rudy has more baggage than Samsonite. But that's okay, the NYPD carries it. /s)
To: george76
Las Vegas editorial on the Kirlins. Good stuff
16
posted on
12/06/2007 7:28:52 AM PST
by
dynachrome
(Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
This is not the only crazy law in Colorado. Adverse possession goes back to English common law, and every state has it in one form are the other.
17
posted on
12/06/2007 7:33:43 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Nevadan
Edith Stevens is a former chair of the Boulder County Democrats. She and her husband are quite close with the Judge who allowed the adverse possession; the Judge did not recuse himself from the case despite being close friends with these land thieves.
18
posted on
12/06/2007 7:35:58 AM PST
by
mallardx
To: sergeantdave
The article also mentioned the Kirlins maintained a fence. Thats as good as a no trespassing sign under our common law. Yes and the fence wasn't built on the property line, the judge gave them the property to the fence.
19
posted on
12/06/2007 7:36:18 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
I was made aware of it when we bought our property here in Missouri. Fortunately, the adverse possession claim resets when property transfers. IE: If you buy land that has prescriptive easement and immediately challenge that use, you can get it canceled by a court.
20
posted on
12/06/2007 7:38:40 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson