In God We Trust, Pledge of Allegiance Cases to be Argued at Ninth Circuit Tomorrow

Pacific Justice.Org ^ | 3-Dec-07 | Unknown

[do the dhue]

I have no objections. Makes me feel like I have contributed. Thank you.

[ohioman]

Mikey Newdow is a worthless POS.

[molette67]

I hear you now why can’t these idiot people quit clogging the court system with these stupid law suits all they want is attention and they should be shot just my little outtake on the situation.Idiots wasting our money and time

[do the dhue]

you got it!

[chimera]

Now, Congress is also forbidden from prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Hence, the law of the land says you can not tell me that I can not put a manger scene or the Ten Commandments up. You can not tell me I can not pray. You can not tell me I can not say the Lord's name.

It is ironic that in their zeal to overinterpret and so strictly enforce the first phrase of this Amendment, the courts and legislators overlook the second. One could logically argue that every decision striking down display of a creche, or a cross, or a tablet of the Commandments, or silent prayer in schools, is a violation of the free exercise thereof clause.

[do the dhue]

HEAR HEAR!!

[reagandemocrat]

Think this is bad?

Wait ‘till the ACLU learns what “Sacramento” means.

[joebuck]

Using this reasoning it’s unconstitutional to teach the Declaration of Independence in school.