Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Christmas-Crushing Movie "The Golden Compass"
human events ^ | 11/09/2007 | L. Brent Bozell III

Posted on 11/30/2007 8:06:34 PM PST by Coleus

As the movie studios gear up for a big Christmas movie season, one trailer that looks like a blockbuster is "The Golden Compass," which must be trying to cash in on the "Narnia" movies. It has flashy special-effect polar bears in armor and a young heroic damsel in distress facing off against evil forces. The casting is top-notch, led by Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig, the current star spy in the James Bond movies. But buyer beware: Narnia it's not. It's the anti-Narnia. Instead of a Christian allegory, it's an anti-Christian allegory. The author of "The Golden Compass," Philip Pullman, is an atheist who despises C. S. Lewis and his much-beloved Narnia series. "I thought they were loathsome," he said of those books, "full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself."

This book and movie is only the first in his trilogy, titled "His Dark Materials," that gets more and more anti-religious in each book. Pullman hates orthodox religion and "those who pervert and misuse religion, or any other kind of doctrine with a holy book and a priesthood and an apparatus of power that wields unchallengeable authority, in order to dominate and suppress human freedoms." If you hear the ring of anti-Catholicism, you're right. The evil empire in this movie for children is called the "Magisterium," which is exactly the word Catholics use to describe the teaching authority of the Pope and his bishops. The books are more explicit, in which the evil institution is also called "The Church" and the higher-ups are the "Vatican Council."

British columnist Peter Hitchens has explained how our secular thought-shapers would love for Pullman to undercut Narnia's influence on children: "The cultural elite would like to wipe out this pocket of resistance. They have successfully expelled God from the schools, from the broadcast media and, for the most part, from the Church itself." He writes that while Lewis mocked atheists as joyless, Pullman depicts priests as evil and murderous, drunk and probably perverted, and the Church as "a conspiracy against happiness and kindness."

Isn't it a bit perverse to head into the Christmas holiday season hyping an atheist fantasy movie for kids? No doubt sensing this, Pullman and the moviemakers have ventured on a dishonest but energetic public-relations campaign to convince the public that this film isn't really anti-Christian. It's a plea for open-mindedness and spiritual dialogue. The Church is just a metaphor, see. The movie's director, Chris Weitz, spins it this way: "In the books, the Magisterium is a version of the Catholic Church gone wildly astray from its roots. If that's what you want in the film, you'll be disappointed." Weitz says they merely "expanded the range of meanings" for the Magisterium, that it's merely a metaphor for tyranny of any stripe: "Philip Pullman is against any kind of organized dogma whether it is Church hierarchy or, say, a Soviet hierarchy." That would be more believable if Hollywood had a track record of casting a Soviet hierarchy as evil -- and if Hollywood didn't have its own organized dogma of secular fundamentalism.

Nicole Kidman spins it her way: "I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn't be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic." The media have played happily along in disguising Pullman's religion-bashing. On NBC's "Today," weatherman Al Roker delighted in making "The Golden Compass" the fall book selection of "Al's Book Club for Kids." Pullman appeared on NBC to deny that he was really promoting atheism. He touted letting the reader decide what the author intended, in a "democracy of reading." The closest he came to atheism was saying the book championed "open-minded intellectual curiosity." If that sounds like a transparent dodge, it certainly was. He told the students asking questions to think of the Taliban in Afghanistan. But the menace in Pullman's trilogy isn't called the Caliphate, and its hideous monsters aren't mullahs. They are cardinals and priests, and the heroes are an atheist former nun and two rebellious gay male angels.

The atheists may be angry that the movie waters down Pullman's anti-religious message, but they can take comfort in the fact that many parents (and grandparents and even godparents) will, sadly, buy the hype over this movie and buy this trilogy of vicious anti-religious books for the young readers in their lives. To the Christian book buyer, beware: Instead of celebrating God's son born in the flesh, you'll be celebrating God being killed so that man can advance to true consciousness. For those anticipating the wonder of Narnia, you'll have to wait until next May, when "Prince Caspian," the second installment, returns magic to the screen.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: antichristian; atheistsupremacist; boxofficebomb; bozell; christianbashing; chronicallyoffended; culturewar; goldencompass; grinchstolechristmas; liberalbigot; moviereview; religiousintolerance; straighttodvd; thegoldencompass; thenogodgod; waronchristmas; waronchristmas2007
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2007 8:06:35 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

True. Our Sunday School Director warned us about it, thank Heavens. Then we had to warn the grandparents.


2 posted on 11/30/2007 8:08:08 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I work part time selling tickets at the local movie theater. If I am asked, I will say “I will not see the movie because I have read the books, and I found them to be evil.”


3 posted on 11/30/2007 8:09:09 PM PST by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I wonder how well this will do? Although these are cynical times, Anti-Christian polemics don’t prosper at Christmas.


4 posted on 11/30/2007 8:13:54 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I’ve emailed friends and family and warned them about New Line’s bait and switch.


5 posted on 11/30/2007 8:17:35 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I don’t expect it to do particularly well.

Golden Compass is rated PG-13. Most of the fantasy stuff like Narnia, IIRC, was mostly rated PG. The rating alone will scare parents off.


6 posted on 11/30/2007 8:17:43 PM PST by jmyrlefuller (The Associated Press: The most dangerous news organization in America.[TM])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

My 13 year old daughter received three emails last week from friends telling her the movie is anti-Christian. I know she’s passed it on to several others.


7 posted on 11/30/2007 8:19:52 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Oh come on... A little evil Christian hatred during “X Mas”, isn’t that our “rights”?

Maybe we could have a DVD, watch it, the burn the “X Mas” tree, just in time so we can spend money for Kwanzaa?

Ok, in all seriousness, I cannot remember a Christmas season, that was so void of any movie that people were actually excited to see something. I’ll bet, this turns out to be the absolute worst Hollywood box office Christmas since at least the mid 90s.

And of course, mark my words, they’ll blame it on the consumer being tapped out. Not on the fact that the movies were boring, stupid, or hateful like this one.

8 posted on 11/30/2007 8:23:48 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
he said of those books, "full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself."

Is he talking about the Koran?
9 posted on 11/30/2007 8:25:29 PM PST by steel_resolve (If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB; wagglebee

ping


10 posted on 11/30/2007 8:26:15 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
It's a plea for open-mindedness and spiritual dialogue.

Open-mindedness? Like this?

The author of "The Golden Compass," Philip Pullman, is an atheist who despises C. S. Lewis and his much-beloved Narnia series. "I thought they were loathsome," he said of those books, "full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself."

He knows it's a Christian allegory. That's his opinion of Christianity.

The atheists sure have been busy lately.

11 posted on 11/30/2007 8:30:34 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I had no idea. I was going to go see this (Mostly for the analysis of the animation) but I am going to pass.

It sounds annoyingly strident in its apparent mission of deconstructing Christianity, if the critic is to be believed.


12 posted on 11/30/2007 8:33:54 PM PST by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmyrlefuller
It cost $180 million. It has to make a lot to just break even.
13 posted on 11/30/2007 8:36:10 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Professional

“Maybe we could have a DVD, watch it, the burn the “X Mas” tree, just in time so we can spend money for Kwanzaa?”

X Mas tree? You are so 1960s! Today it’s the Holiday Tree, the Winter Tree, or my personal favorite this season, the Family Tree.


14 posted on 11/30/2007 8:50:45 PM PST by Breyean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Even more reason to keep praying this behemoth bombs. If it fails, they won’t do the other two books after this one.

BTW (spoiler here): in the later books they kill “god”.


15 posted on 11/30/2007 8:53:21 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Breyean

How about... The Satan tree, sponsored by McDonalds, Coke, and Walmart. Please give us all your money, so we don’t have to fire you, destroy the economy? Yes your job sucked, but it was all you had...

Sick twisted world...


16 posted on 11/30/2007 8:57:44 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Nicole Kidman spins it her way: "I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn't be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic."

I was surprised by her role in it and her comments. I know, I shouldn't have been. It doesn't surprise me that it's aimed at children at Christmas. But as good atheists, why would they care when it's released, except if their effort is not aimed at entertaining via movie, but rather slamming Christianity at Christmas? Jmho. Flyers have appeared in my church. I was actually surprised, given my area's weak response to the occult overtones ignored or whitewashed by some local Catholics in the Potter movies. And the relative acceptance of the Da Vinci Code. (Yes, by some clergy and educators.)

17 posted on 11/30/2007 9:01:34 PM PST by fortunecookie (Communism/socialism has failed millions, it wasn't right for them - and it isn't right for US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; jmyrlefuller
It cost $180 million. It has to make a lot to just break even.

I know - the public schools can send their grade schoolers as a group during school hours as a pre-winter break celebration! That ought to prop up revenues! /s

18 posted on 11/30/2007 9:03:54 PM PST by fortunecookie (Communism/socialism has failed millions, it wasn't right for them - and it isn't right for US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Even more reason to keep praying this behemoth bombs. If it fails, they won’t do the other two books after this one.

Indeed. We can vote with our dollars, and FR is a great vehicle for spreading the word. This movie sounds like disgusting anti-Christian pro-atheist trash.

IMHO, we should not only boycott the movie, but also any theater that runs it on their screen.

19 posted on 11/30/2007 9:04:04 PM PST by stillonaroll (Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

If you thought god was in trouble when people disobeyed and denied him, just stick around while they ignore him.


20 posted on 11/30/2007 9:05:50 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
It sounds annoyingly strident in its apparent mission of deconstructing Christianity, if the critic is to be believed.

Don't know about the movie, but he is dead on about the books on which it is based.

21 posted on 11/30/2007 9:07:03 PM PST by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
He, Pullman, has the right to write the book. They, the writers, directors, and producers in Hollywood, have the right to make a movie out of it. We, the decent American Populace who are in large part Christian, have the right to ignore the book and the movie and choose another book or another movie this Christmas (not X-mas) Season.

I remember some years ago, that they made another movie (which most if not all Christians ignored) called "The Last Temptation of Christ" and I heard that it did not do well at the box office. I can't help but wonder, did they ever managed to recover the cost of making that vile piece of garbage?

22 posted on 11/30/2007 9:12:00 PM PST by Friend_from_the_Frozen_North (If you are, as Rush would say, "A Glittering Jewel of Colossal Ignorance" don't waste my time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I hope this movie tanks like Tom Cruise’s anti-military movie did.


23 posted on 11/30/2007 9:14:27 PM PST by ClarenceThomasfan (Don't be a kamikoze Conservative! Vote Republican in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Hah, I found a bad “review” of this through technorati. Apparently there is a lock down on reviews so...

“”””
What if I broke my silence about the movie? Let’s suppose, for a moment, I told everyone that, controversy aside, the movie is a whopping letdown… a tangled mess of storytelling… with an off-puttingly shrill and obstinate little girl in the lead… and that it’s anticlimactic and unsatisfying. Let’s pretend that I found its climactic confrontation between polar bears to be a hollow re-enactment of the climactic scene from The Karate Kid, something so muc less satisfying than the stories of true heroism offered by Tolkien and Lewis. Let’s imagine I was underwhelmed by the concluding hubbub, a CGI battlefield spectacle so much like those we’ve seen in other recent films. Let’s just pretend that was my opinion, for kicks. Would I be in trouble for saying so?
“”””
http://lookingcloser.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/chattaway-new-line-marketing-golden-compass-to-catholics-plus-catholic-news-service-pretty-much-gives-it-a-thumbs-up/

Personally, I don’t care anymore. It would be different if it weren’t for the “professional christians” who get “outraged” over everything. Now I just laugh at popular culture and the idiots who get paid to denounce it.


24 posted on 11/30/2007 9:17:41 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Atheists to erect holiday display
25 posted on 11/30/2007 9:57:42 PM PST by Coleus (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillonaroll

I’d agree with you (about boycotting the theaters that run it) but there’s such crap movies running right now, people are pretty much staying away on their own. It’s like all the money is being sucked up in special effects and by a few mega-stars people are tired of seeing.


26 posted on 11/30/2007 10:24:52 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
I’d agree with you (about boycotting the theaters that run it) but there’s such crap movies running right now, people are pretty much staying away on their own. It’s like all the money is being sucked up in special effects and by a few mega-stars people are tired of seeing.

True. Mrs. Still and I go to one movie about every two years.

27 posted on 11/30/2007 10:39:13 PM PST by stillonaroll (Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
It has flashy special-effect polar bears in armor and a young heroic damsel in distress facing off against evil forces.

How rich is this: an atheist who uses fantasy (i.e. supernatural) figures to fight "evil" (and how religiously judgmental is it to define evil for us)?

28 posted on 11/30/2007 10:51:19 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillonaroll

It’s been at least 3-4 years since I’ve set foot in a public theater. And 2-3 years gap before that last time.


29 posted on 11/30/2007 10:54:49 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Friend_from_the_Frozen_North
I remember some years ago, that they made another movie (which most if not all Christians ignored) called "The Last Temptation of Christ" and I heard that it did not do well at the box office. I can't help but wonder, did they ever managed to recover the cost of making that vile piece of garbage?

If you didn't see it, what on earth qualifies you to judge the movie as a "vile piece of garbage"? How is this any different than the millions of Muslims who condemned "The Satanic Verses" despite the fact they'd never read it, let alone understood it?
30 posted on 11/30/2007 11:00:02 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Breyean
Today it’s the Holiday Tree, the Winter Tree, or my personal favorite this season, the Family Tree.

Don't forget Martha Stewart's Everyday Pre-lit trees....

31 posted on 11/30/2007 11:08:28 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
I'm aware of the controversy concerning the movie (and the books) and quite frankly, don't care.

I recall the hand-wringing over the Harry Potter novels and movies, and the dire predictions of a rising occult movement and epidemics of devil worship..
But, it didn't happen, and many people, adults and children alike, have enjoyed the books and movies for what they are. Entertainment.

Anyone that thinks this movie, or the book(s) are so terrible, try reading the real history of Christianity and the Catholic Church, and following that, the Protestant movement.
Read the historical facts about the Cathars, Gnostics, Inquisition, the Witch Hunts, etc..
Organized religion of all stripes have abused their power and done some really wicked things, people.
Much like government. And I don't see all of your defending government that much.
That's why the Puritans and Quakers came to America, due to religious persecution by the organized religions of Europe, both Catholic and Protestant.

If Christians or any other religious group are offended, maybe it's because they are seeing so many parallels between their own religion's past and Pullman's depiction of a tyrannical, oppressive, fictional religious order.
And that's organized religion's fault, not Pullman's.

32 posted on 11/30/2007 11:53:38 PM PST by Drammach (Freedom - It's not just a job, It's an Adventure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.onenewsnow.com/google-results.php?cx=004820740808712591078%3A1htm9us-qxi&cof=FORID%3A11&q=Golden+compass&sa=Click+to+Search+News

#

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200711/CUL20071121d.html

“Catholic Group to Boycott ‘The Golden Compass’”
By Pete Winn
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
November 21, 2007

(CNSNews.com) -

ARTICLE SNIPPET: “The group’s objections center not on the film itself, McCaffrey said, but on the now 10-year-old trilogy of books from which “The Golden Compass” is taken, titled “His Dark Materials.”

“The three novels are extremely anti-faith in general, anti-Christian and anti-Catholic in particular, and pro-atheism,” McCaffrey told Cybercast News Service. “In each successive book, the anti-God agenda gets progressively stronger.”

She said the New Line Cinema movie is designed to suck unwitting kids and their parents into the atheistic agenda of the books’ British author, Philip Pullman.

“This man has been on the record for the last 12 years saying things such as, ‘I am all for the death of God,’ and ‘My books are all about killing God,’ and ‘I am of the Devil’s party and I know it,’ “ McCaffrey said.”


33 posted on 11/30/2007 11:54:04 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
How is this any different than the millions of Muslims who condemned "The Satanic Verses" despite the fact they'd never read it, let alone understood it?

I don't recall the Pope issuing a fa-qua to have the director killed

34 posted on 11/30/2007 11:59:46 PM PST by tophat9000 (You need to have standards to fail and be a hypocrite, Dem's therefor are never hypocrites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Our Sunday School Director warned us about it, thank Heavens. Then we had to warn the grandparents.

Oooh - baby boomer grandparents? Could e the toughest job of all.

35 posted on 12/01/2007 12:00:42 AM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Sounds like another attack on our culture from Hollywood. They really never get tired of doing this to us, do they?


36 posted on 12/01/2007 12:23:24 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

“They really never get tired of doing this to us, do they?”

No, they don’t.

Just like the jihadis, the leftist agenda is focused on their agenda.


37 posted on 12/01/2007 12:31:34 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I don't recall the Pope issuing a fa-qua to have the director killed

No, but there's a common thread of condemning and denouncing works of art - books, films, cartoons, whatever - without any first-hand knowledge about them, based on what some religious authority tells them. The world will be a better place if people think and make decisions for themselves.
38 posted on 12/01/2007 12:54:35 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Exactly. Don’t listen to anyone! How do you really know cyanide is bad for you just because some “authority” says so? Try it yourself and make your own decision!


39 posted on 12/01/2007 1:00:50 AM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

If they told you football was a work of the devil, would you believe that as well? Just askin...


40 posted on 12/01/2007 1:06:08 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
Exactly. Don’t listen to anyone! How do you really know cyanide is bad for you just because some “authority” says so? Try it yourself and make your own decision!

I was talking about works of art - films, books, cartoons, among other things. Do you really think that exposure to any of these will kill you like cyanide? Will taking a look at them for yourself corrupt you somehow? Or weaken your faith? Religious people sometimes get so worked up over the creative works of others - what are they so afraid of?
41 posted on 12/01/2007 1:13:41 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

Yes, I would! Absolutely! I can’t think for myself at all. I copy everyone and everything. In fact, I’m thinking of renaming myself “militantnutcase” because it’d be such a cool name, especially if “militant” were spelled correctly.


42 posted on 12/01/2007 1:14:42 AM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
....."Is he talking about the Koran?"......

Yes he is, and he made Mohamed out to be an animal. I think every Muslim should be informed of this, especially in Sudan.

43 posted on 12/01/2007 1:14:51 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Nice comeback. Right out of the middle school playbook to immediately snap back with a personal attack on my forum name. FYI, if militant wasn’t taken at the time I might have used that one instead.


44 posted on 12/01/2007 1:22:47 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Do you really think that exposure to any of these will kill you like cyanide?

No. My point it's idiotic to adopt the position that one must experience everything personally without considering the advice and recommendations of others. Apologists for the Pullman seem to have a problem with Christians pointing out the author's own anti-Christian words. No one is trying to censor these books or movies. It's about informing parents about the author's agenda, so that they can make their own decisions about what they buy for their children. If you want to embrace anti-Christian propaganda, that's your right. If I or anyone else wishes to reject this garbage and recommend that others do the same, that's our right. Why is only Christianity fair game? If this were a pro-Nazi film or an anti-Semitic film or an overtly racist film, few would dare assert that the world would be "a better place" if everyone were encouraged to see it and allowed to come to their own conclusions.
45 posted on 12/01/2007 1:24:43 AM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

Ah, that’s a shame. But I’m sure that, one day, you’ll find your own special place in the world where the name “militantnutcase” is available!


46 posted on 12/01/2007 1:27:28 AM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Yeah, I’m looking forward to it. Does my name offend you? =P


47 posted on 12/01/2007 1:38:20 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
The world will be a better place if people think and make decisions for themselves.

Then why do you post on an internet message board trying to influence others? Shouldn't they be allowed to form opinions without your help?

People have a right to be informed in the face of a deliberately deceptive multimillion dollar ad campaign.

48 posted on 12/01/2007 3:09:46 AM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
My point it's idiotic to adopt the position that one must experience everything personally without considering the advice and recommendations of others.

And my point is it's idiotic to blindly follow the the lead of others in their opinions of artistic content. The poster I originally responded to had never seen "The Last Temptation Of Christ" yet felt qualified to pass judgement on it. This is nonsense, whether it's done by Muslims or Christians or Buddhists or anyone else.

if this were a pro-Nazi film or an anti-Semitic film or an overtly racist film, few would dare assert that the world would be "a better place" if everyone were encouraged to see it and allowed to come to their own conclusions.

Never mind making the world "a better place". If you're going to render an opinion on a book or film, call it vile or racist or whatever else, you'd better have seen it or read it. Otherwise why would you think your opinion on the material in question is worth anything? If you have no first-hand experience, you're simply parroting what someone else said - someone who may not have any exposure to the material in question either. Take this far enough and you have the blind leading the blind - a lot of uninformed opinions from people who don't really know anything about the material they're objecting to. This is exactly what we see in Muslims getting worked up over cartoons and movies, with the additional Muslim ingredient of violence.

I won't be seeing the movie - I read the books and found them kind of dull. But at least I know why I don't like them. A lot of the people objecting to the movie won't.
49 posted on 12/01/2007 3:32:11 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself."

But it's okay for you to hate and despise people unlike yourself, like C.S. Lewis for one.

50 posted on 12/01/2007 3:37:16 AM PST by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson