To: newguy357
Yes, that was a stupid thought. While liberal arts professors make their bones writing about nothing, engineers and scientists get their prestige and earnings from actually doing something. Find nothing and they’ll generally find their funding going bye-bye (ethanol excepted).
Besides, a $15 billion accelerator has a much greater chance of producing benefits than a $15 billion road project in downtown Boston.
9 posted on
11/26/2007 6:28:27 PM PST by
LenS
To: LenS
The annual budget for a collider is just about the same as for a large (government-funded-liberal-artsy) symphony, or opera, or arts museum.....
Construction funding is higher, but more people get something from the collider, on a per-person basis, if you consider the 2nd & 3rd tier results.
12 posted on
11/26/2007 6:48:56 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: LenS
if they don’t find anything they’ll still get funding from the govt or a grant from govt subsidized universities. That’s why you have tenured liberal arts professors in the first place.
14 posted on
11/26/2007 6:51:53 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(CONgress is the opposite of PROgress)
To: LenS
Besides, a $15 billion accelerator has a much greater chance of producing benefits than a $15 billion road project in downtown Boston. Not if the road leads out of Boston...
21 posted on
11/26/2007 8:40:31 PM PST by
Alex Murphy
("Therefore the prudent keep silent at that time, for it is an evil time." - Amos 5:13)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson