Skip to comments.
Newly Discovered Methane-Consuming Bacterium Could Help Reduce GHG Emissions ...
www.greencarcongress.com ^
| 11/26/2007
| Staff
Posted on 11/26/2007 1:18:22 PM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^0
To: Red Badger
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^0Obviously, a massive government program is needed to develop this, funded by an initial grant of $100 billion.
2
posted on
11/26/2007 1:21:20 PM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: mvpel
The search could take decades........
3
posted on
11/26/2007 1:22:29 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Red Badger
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^I think that I will never see a bacterium as lovely as a tree . . .
I'm picturing an Andromeda Strain situation; a bacteria gone wild that eats the world starting from the various methane producing buttocks of mammals and working it's way inside . . .
4
posted on
11/26/2007 1:24:26 PM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Red Badger
To: GovernmentShrinker
Oh, yes, the pork projects could be endless...............
6
posted on
11/26/2007 1:28:02 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Red Badger
I want one which 'eats' CO
2 and emits CH
4.
Under controlled conditions, it would revolutionize natural gas production (think energy, folks--these critters they are ballyhooing will eat it).
7
posted on
11/26/2007 1:28:42 PM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Red Badger
The search could take decades........ Only studying tree rings will tell how long!
8
posted on
11/26/2007 1:28:42 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Red Badger
If it eats methane, what does it fart?
9
posted on
11/26/2007 1:28:47 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
If it eats methane, what does it fart?Crisp mountain air.
10
posted on
11/26/2007 1:29:51 PM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Red Badger
I just reduce my acidic methane producing environment with a Tums.
11
posted on
11/26/2007 1:29:57 PM PST
by
dblshot
To: tacticalogic
I almost choked on my coffee.......
12
posted on
11/26/2007 1:30:16 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Red Badger
We have a couple of closed land fills that trap the methane and use it to provide energy to homes in the area, at a reduced rate.
Here's a stat on one of them:
" The Greene Valley Forest Preserve gas-to-energy facility extracted 1,606,439,126 cubic feet of methane gas fromthe landfill, which generated 62,041,313 kilowatt hours for the purchaser and $317,233 in revenue for the District."
I wonder how much methane eating microbes would cut into this..
To: stylin19a
I wonder how much methane eating microbes would cut into this. I wonder what happens when this critter gets loose in our natural gas supply!
14
posted on
11/26/2007 1:33:17 PM PST
by
Species8472
(Politically motivated science is meaningless)
To: Smokin' Joe
15
posted on
11/26/2007 1:34:14 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Red Badger
16
posted on
11/26/2007 1:36:16 PM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: bert
Yup. Seems far easier, especially with the new Stirling engine-based generators/cogen sets coming on-line.
Plus methanotrophs require oxygen to be pumped down to them if one is trying to remediate a landfill - not a cheap or simple task.
17
posted on
11/26/2007 1:38:47 PM PST
by
Tirian
To: Red Badger
GHG Emissions?
Gastrointestinal Heinie Gas Emissions, perhaps?
To: Red Badger
This is bunk. Methane is natural gas. The most ecologically efficient way of getting rid of methane is to burn it. This does yield CO2, but methane is twenty times as powerful a greenhouse gas than plain old CO2, so why not make use of its energy potential as heat while you’re at it?
To: All
I thought methane was tapped at garbage dumps to generate electricity. Isn’t this a little counterproductive?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson