Scott McClellan Levels Charges of Deception Against White House Over CIA Leak Case

Fox News ^ | Tuesday, November 20, 2007

[jennyjenny]

First, she wasn’t covert. And if she was, the president can declassify anything he wants/whenever he wants. Case (should be) closed.

Second, the White House didn’t know/ didn’t care if Armitage blabbed. He is a fool on many levels and I feel better now that he is no longer in his position.

Third, the investigation is over. No one could prove she was covert. No cover up.

Lastly, I’m not going to judge this based on 2 paragraphs from an entire book. The majority of America doesn’t care about this and they are right not to. Oh yeah, McClellan was awful at his job, too.

[jennyjenny]

No one else cares. They didn’t care then and they don’t care now. In fact, most don’t and never did know anything about it.

[Eagles6]

THERE WAS NO LEAK! PLAME WAS NOT COVERT!

[Christian4Bush]

Oh boy....Chris Matthews is going to go purple on this one.

Matthews, David Shuster, Keith Overbite...Alan Colmes just made a new best friend...Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson, Dingy Harry...

[Verginius Rufus]

I haven't gone over all the testimony, but appeared that the evidence that Libby lied consisted in contrary recollections by others like Tim Russert, who had less than stellar records of correctly remembering the facts...but the prosecutor was out to get someone and the jurors convicted Libby because they didn't have the chance to convict anyone higher up in the administration.

[sappy]

Scott. How could Rove and Libby be involved when Armitage admitted he is the leaker?