Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Senator Goldwater
"Giuliani once again negates concerns over his social positions by supporting strict constructionists to the federal bench, unlike in NYC, where Rudy had to appoint judges from a Democrat-chosen slate."

How do you know if Rudy is lying?

If his lips are moving!
14 posted on 11/16/2007 9:12:13 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Now, who are you going to believe? Rudy or your lying eyes?


34 posted on 11/16/2007 10:07:05 PM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; stephenjohnbanker; 2ndDivisionVet; Mojave; HuntsvilleTxVeteran; DesScorp; ...
Giuliani is a bloviating bag of wind. He and the neo-pukes running his campaign are obsessed with religious cleansing the Repub Party and kicking so/cons to the curb. The connivers belatedly calculated Rooty REALLY needs so/cons to make a primary showing....so the nitwit changes his tune. Every word out of Rooty's mouth is focus-grouped to the nth degree. Read on:

Giuliani Vexes Audiences With His Abortion Views
FR Posted 11/16/2007 by jaybeegee

..Giuliani has made the case that while he believes that abortions are wrong, he thinks the ultimate decision should be up to women, not the government. It is a position that has confused some people ....

Kelli Conlon of (the radical pro-abortion) NARAL-NY recalled that Giuliani put her on his transition team when he was elected mayor. Mayor Giuliani issued proclamations to mark the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. (And received more NARAL campaign contributions than NARAL gave to Hillary.) But Ms. Conlon said she was troubled to hear Giuliani say he would appoint justices in the model of Justices Scalia and Thomas...(and intends to sit down with Giuliani and his colleagues out of the glare of the cameras)......

Giuliani also spoke about religion in the public sphere. “I cannot figure out where some imperative exists to ban the mention of the 10 amendments in a public square,” he said (after discussing the Bill of Rights). Then he corrected himself: “The 10 Commandments.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com..........

76 posted on 11/18/2007 5:49:40 PM PST by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson