To: BibChr
Yes, “Mindless Chaos” certainly makes much more sense on every level. And "God did it" may provide a satisfactory answer from a theological standpoint but it makes for very poor science.
13 posted on
11/15/2007 5:48:43 AM PST by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Non-Sequitur
24 posted on
11/15/2007 6:00:15 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Non-Sequitur
Up until recently, most of the prominent scientists were of the mindset that their goal was to DISCOVER God’s rules in the universe.
Yes, you can say that the Creator used evolution to accomplish His creation.
But that’s not what many of the evolutionists’ goals are - their goal is to “disprove” the existance of a Creator, and therefore be unaccountable to anyone but themselves.
55 posted on
11/15/2007 6:22:55 AM PST by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
111 posted on
11/15/2007 8:11:56 AM PST by
woollyone
(entropy extirpates evolution and conservation confirms the Creator blessed forever.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Seems to me that Newton believed that *Goddidit* and I fail to see how that hampered the advances he made in science.
Perhaps you could give some examples of that.
165 posted on
11/15/2007 7:18:40 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson